This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: __main

From: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>
To: Mike Laman <mlaman at cox dot net>
Cc: GCC <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 2 Sep 2002 22:51:47 +1000
Subject: Re: __main
References: <002f01c24f89$6ad6efa0$0a00000a@zarquin> <20020830044008.A479336@murlibobo.cs.mu.OZ.AU> <001e01c24fe4$f4b6e580$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com> <20020901160425.GA13739@ceres.cs.mu.oz.au> <001901c251f4$5cd6db50$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com> <20020902055611.GA2016@mars.cs.mu.oz.au> <002f01c2526c$caec13d0$5aa80844@fed1.sdca.home.com>

On 02-Sep-2002, Mike Laman <mlaman@cox.net> wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing the point, but I think these issues are with the
> compiler - not the assembler. The assembler is already defined -
> such can be the life with cross compiling.

The issue could be a bug with a particular back-end port of the compiler.
If the system as a whole doesn't support symbols starting with an
underscore, then it is not a conforming C implementation.

Which port is it?  Is it one that is included in the FSF version of GCC?
Is it a port that you got from someone else?
Or is it a port that you are implementing yourself?

-- 
Fergus Henderson <fjh@cs.mu.oz.au>  |  "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne         |  of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh>  |     -- the last words of T. S. Garp.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: __main
  - From: Mike Laman

References:
- Re: __main
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: __main
  - From: Mike Laman
- Re: __main
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: __main
  - From: Mike Laman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]