This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.2 Success (sort of) on Solaris 2.5.1
- From: Martin Kahlert <martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com>
- To: jcea at argo dot es
- Cc: janis187 at us dot ibm dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2002 08:21:25 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.2 Success (sort of) on Solaris 2.5.1
- References: <3D6CB0DE.F769AEEF@argo.es> <20020828094532.A1326@us.ibm.com>
- Reply-to: martin dot kahlert at infineon dot com
Hi!
On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 09:45:32AM -0700, janis187@us.ibm.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2002 at 01:15:42PM +0200, Jesus Cea Avion wrote:
> > Please, update http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.2/buildstat.html
> > I finally determine that GNU binutils "ld" is the problem. I was using
> > binutils 2.13. I compile binutils 2.12.1, install *ONLY* the "ld"
> > component (I keep the other 2.13 utils and libraries) and every goes
> > fine now.
>
> See the message at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-08/msg01834.html from
> Vee Voon Yee, who reports the same problem with ld 2.13 on Solaris 2.6.
>
> I recommend starting over, this time using binutils 2.12.1, unless
> someone who knows more about this problem responds with better advice.
Please check the thread starting at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-02/msg00881.html
I have one Solaris 2.5.1 machine left here and had a lot of problem
with binutils. So i completely eliminated them on that OS for gcc
and only use Sun's tools
(configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld)
Built this way everything seems quite stable here.
Sorry i did a complete bootstrap, but no testsuite run.
Hope that helps a bit,
Martin.
--
The early bird catches the worm. If you want something else for
breakfast, get up later.