This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sat, 10 Aug 2002 22:17:01 -0700
Subject: Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
References: <20020809140937.GA20231@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <20020809225721.GD6018@redhat.com> <20020810061512.GB25137@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <20020810213152.GA6434@redhat.com> <1029017017.6792.4.camel@frodo> <20020810221204.GD9277@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> <1029020428.6792.49.camel@frodo>

On Sat, Aug 10, 2002 at 07:00:28PM -0400, Diego Novillo wrote:
> The question is, what about target-defined builtins? 
> Should the simplifier leave them alone?

No.  Never.  Simplify and optimize as ususal.


r~

References:
- [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Richard Henderson
- Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Optimizing non-SIMPLE trees
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]