This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: "Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at twiddle dot net>, Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2002 13:43:26 -0700
Subject: Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils

--On Monday, August 05, 2002 10:16:35 PM +0200 "Martin v. Loewis" <martin@v.loewis.de> wrote:

Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:

I agree.  I don't think we need to do this for GCC 3.2, but I do think
it would be good to do this at some point.

If you don't do this for 3.2, you will definitely end up with two
incompatible ABIs on Linux, both of them in wide use.

Walk me through it, if you please.

How will this happen?

--
Mark Mitchell                mark@codesourcery.com
CodeSourcery, LLC            http://www.codesourcery.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

References:
- Re: libgcc_s, Linux, and PT_GNU_EH_FRAME, and binutils
  - From: Martin v. Loewis

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]