This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: C++ ABI testing issues, gcc-3.3 <-> gcc-3.2 compatibility


Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 09:00:29AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:

> > Here're the results on i686-linux-gnu from GCC 3.2 branch as of
> > 2002-08-04:
> >
> > ./bitfield1
> > Test 1 Failure: bitfield1.cpp:59

> > ./dynamic1
> > Test 9 Failure: dynamic1.cpp:79

> > ./virtual3
> > Test 4 Failure: virtual3.cpp:65

> > ./virtual9
> > Test 9 Failure: virtual9.cpp:92

> > ./vtable1
> > Test 3 Failure: vtable1.cpp:70
> > ./vtable2
> > Test 3 Failure: vtable2.cpp:102
I am not seeing any of these failures, with & without
-DUSE_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS. Top of cp/Changelog is
2002-08-03  Nathan Sidwell  <nathan@codesourcery.com>

        PR 7470.
        C++ ABI change - vfunc ordering.

> > And the known failure for new (we have size_t == int on
> > i686-linux-gnu):
> >
> >   missing: _Znwm
> >   missing: _Znam
> > make: *** [operator1.pass] Error 1
testcase bug.

nathan

-- 
Dr Nathan Sidwell   ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::   CodeSourcery LLC
         'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]