This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: C++ ABI testing issues, gcc-3.3 <-> gcc-3.2 compatibility
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 05, 2002 at 09:00:29AM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> > Here're the results on i686-linux-gnu from GCC 3.2 branch as of
> > 2002-08-04:
> >
> > ./bitfield1
> > Test 1 Failure: bitfield1.cpp:59
> > ./dynamic1
> > Test 9 Failure: dynamic1.cpp:79
> > ./virtual3
> > Test 4 Failure: virtual3.cpp:65
> > ./virtual9
> > Test 9 Failure: virtual9.cpp:92
> > ./vtable1
> > Test 3 Failure: vtable1.cpp:70
> > ./vtable2
> > Test 3 Failure: vtable2.cpp:102
I am not seeing any of these failures, with & without
-DUSE_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS. Top of cp/Changelog is
2002-08-03 Nathan Sidwell <nathan@codesourcery.com>
PR 7470.
C++ ABI change - vfunc ordering.
> > And the known failure for new (we have size_t == int on
> > i686-linux-gnu):
> >
> > missing: _Znwm
> > missing: _Znam
> > make: *** [operator1.pass] Error 1
testcase bug.
nathan
--
Dr Nathan Sidwell :: http://www.codesourcery.com :: CodeSourcery LLC
'But that's a lie.' - 'Yes it is. What's your point?'
nathan@codesourcery.com : http://www.cs.bris.ac.uk/~nathan/ : nathan@acm.org