This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: tablejump index

From: Momchil Velikov <velco at fadata dot bg>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 31 Jul 2002 09:52:19 +0300
Subject: Re: tablejump index
References: <87znw9eapj.fsf@fadata.bg> <20020730180243.A27684@redhat.com>

>>>>> "Richard" == Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> writes:

Richard> On Tue, Jul 30, 2002 at 02:06:48PM +0300, Momchil Velikov wrote:
>> How about having a mode where the operand 0 of the tablejump expander
>> is an index into the jump table, instead of jump target address?

Richard> See casesi.

Thanks.  It was a stupid proposal.  The compiler does the right thing
having an expandeer where the compiler does nothing and having an
expander where the compiler does everything.

~velco

References:
- tablejump index
  - From: Momchil Velikov
- Re: tablejump index
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]