This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
- From: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
- To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>,Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>, Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>,Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2002 08:42:43 +0200
- Subject: Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation
- References: <wvllm86k1m1.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>
Jason Merrill <jason@redhat.com> writes:
> In a previous thread, Diego has suggested that inlining would be done on
> language-dependent trees. I think this is a mistake; IMO it should be done
> at the SIMPLE level. Requiring the inliner to know about frontend trees is
> wrong.
Inlining on SIMPLE might also allow to inline mixed languages, e.g. C
code into Fortran. I'm not sure how many people use this kind of mixed
languages for one project but if they do, it would help,
Andreas
--
Andreas Jaeger
SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
private aj@arthur.inka.de
http://www.suse.de/~aj