This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures?


On 16 Jul 2002, Falk Hueffner wrote:

> Daniel Berlin <dberlin@dberlin.org> writes:
> 
> > > Thanks, this fixes the problem. Improvements are moderate on my test
> > > case, though:
> > > 
> > >                   number of stack writes
> > > gcc -O1             0
> > > Compaq Compiler    11 (the caller saved registers)
> > > gcc -O3           119
> > > gcc -O3 -fnew-ra  101
> > > 
> > > Are you interested in the test case?
> >
> > SUre, if course like, though a 20% reduction is nothing to sneeze
> > at.
> 
> It would be great normally, but in this case, most or all of the
> stores could be eliminated, as -O1 shows, and I had hoped the new
> regalloc would manage that.
I'll need to see the case.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]