This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: new build scheme naming


On Mon, Jul 08, 2002 at 04:01:17PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> 
> > That actually *works*?  It doesn't fail because the million Make
> > variables passed down from the top level are missing?...
> 
> Yup, I do that all the time.  For normal builds, the variables passed
> down happen to be the defaults anyway, so it doesn't matter.  But for
> some things (like, say, building target libraries) it's more important
> to be called from the top so that you get the variables.  GCC's make
> just happens to work without them, that's all.
> 
> > Why are we passing all these variables down to lower level makes?
> 
> In case you need to override them on an all-build basis.
Mmm, right; I guess certain makes don't automatically pass down
variables specified on the command line.

--Nathanael


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]