This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?

From: Daniel Egger <degger at fhm dot edu>
To: obrien at freebsd dot org
Cc: GCC Developer Mailinglist <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 06 Jul 2002 13:48:02 +0200
Subject: Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
References: <u8k7ob78p1.fsf@gromit.moeb><18910000.1025898677@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <u88z4qvsts.fsf@gromit.moeb><19510000.1025899870@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <20020705143353.D89951@dragon.nuxi.com>

Am Fre, 2002-07-05 um 23.33 schrieb David O'Brien:

> Would we see it in KDE and GNOME and all the related C++ libs there?

You can trivially count the GNOME applications and libraries written in
C++ with your hands. KDE might be much more of a problem here
escpecially since they're driving gcc at its maximum in the hope to
get fast and small binaries.
 
-- 
Servus,
       Daniel

References:
- C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2?
  - From: David O'Brien

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]