gcc archive
date index for July, 2002

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

July 31, 2002
23:52 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Jakub Jelinek
23:38 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Gareth Pearce
23:14 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts H. J. Lu
23:03 Re: C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Per Bothner
22:59 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Gareth Pearce
22:42 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Gareth Pearce
22:32 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts H. J. Lu
22:08 extend an existing RTX Andreas Bauer
21:58 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts John David Anglin
20:30 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Gareth Pearce
20:12 RE: C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Gary Funck
19:58 tree dump utility flsp
19:19 Re: commutative asm operands Richard Henderson
19:14 Re: commutative asm operands Alan Modra
19:03 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Daniel Jacobowitz
18:57 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Joe Buck
18:11 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Daniel Jacobowitz
18:06 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Gareth Pearce
17:21 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol John David Anglin
16:31 Re: generic simd and c++ Gabriel Dos Reis
15:59 Re: C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Stan Shebs
15:48 Re: commutative asm operands Richard Henderson
15:37 [tree-ssa] Array accesses Pop Sébastian
15:36 Re: C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Neil Booth
15:31 Re: generic simd and c++ Daniel Egger
15:27 RE: C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Gary Funck
15:10 Re: C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Neil Booth
14:08 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Joe Buck
14:02 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Mark Mitchell
13:54 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Joe Buck
13:50 Re: Web search only matches the subject??? Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:49 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol Robert Dewar
13:37 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol Daniel Berlin
13:35 Re: gcc 3.3 Mark Mitchell
13:11 Re: generic simd and c++ Benjamin Kosnik
13:10 Re: generic simd and c++ Andrew Pinski
12:47 Strange RTL Chris Lattner
12:44 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol Zack Weinberg
12:36 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol Daniel Jacobowitz
12:35 Re: generic simd and c++ Aldy Hernandez
12:23 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol Jack Howarth
12:21 Your advert in www.bau-center.com TALB
11:53 Re: Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Devang Patel
11:10 [tree-ssa-branch] Merged mainline into branch as of 2002-07-28 Diego Novillo
10:47 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Phil Edwards
10:45 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Andreas Schwab
10:41 Re: Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Christoph Hellwig
10:36 Re: gcc 3.3 Phil Edwards
10:34 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Daniel Jacobowitz
10:34 Re: [v3] char_traits fixups round two Benjamin Kosnik
10:29 Re: libstdc++-v3/src/fstream.cc missing B. Kosnik
10:15 Building Ada in 3.1.1 when CC!=gcc Albert Chin
09:55 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Stan Shebs
09:54 Re: Optimizing g++ 3.2 Joe Buck
09:45 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Joe Buck
09:39 Re: Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Stan Shebs
09:39 Re: gcc 3.3 Joe Buck
09:33 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Joe Buck
09:19 Re: Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Daniel Berlin
09:07 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Mark Mitchell
09:06 Re: Optimizing g++ 3.2 Andreas Jaeger
09:04 Re: Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Mike Stump
09:03 Re: GCC 3.2 Mark Mitchell
08:58 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Mark Mitchell
08:54 g++.pt/repo3.C regression between 3.1.1 and 3.2? Franz Sirl
08:39 mainline libstdc++ build failure Diego Novillo
08:30 Re: [v3] char_traits fixups round two Gabriel Dos Reis
08:20 libstdc++-v3/src/fstream.cc missing Andreas Schwab
08:10 Re: [v3] char_traits fixups round two Richard Earnshaw
08:04 Re: [v3] char_traits fixups round two David Edelsohn
07:50 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Michael Matz
07:14 commutative asm operands Alan Modra
06:35 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Jan-Benedict Glaw
06:24 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Jeff Garzik
06:20 Re: why no gcc3_compiled symbol Andreas Schwab
06:16 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Andreas Schwab
06:15 Re: gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Gareth Pearce
06:11 Optimizing g++ 3.2 Richard Guenther
06:09 Re: Gcc 2.8.1 Gerald Pfeifer
06:03 Gcc 2.8.1 Rao L Srinivasa-A15309
05:22 gcc 3.2's cpp breaks configure scripts Jeff Garzik
05:05 why no gcc3_compiled symbol Jack Howarth
02:11 Re: Problem: gcc 3.1.1 / cross-gcc / arm-thumb-elf Richard Earnshaw
01:40 Problem: gcc 3.1.1 / cross-gcc / arm-thumb-elf 42Bastian Schick
00:24 harmless typo in configure.in (gcc 3.1.1) Gary Funck
00:17 C++ lexer (GCC 3.1.1) requires knowledge of other C dialects Gary Funck

July 30, 2002
23:52 Re: tablejump index Momchil Velikov
23:45 Re: Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Neil Booth
23:41 Re: GCC 3.2 Neil Booth
23:28 Re: GCC 3.2 Neil Booth
21:48 Apple's PFE for GCC is now available Stan Shebs
21:44 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Raja R Harinath
21:41 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Raja R Harinath
20:08 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Daniel Jacobowitz
20:02 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes H. J. Lu
19:59 Re: gcc 3.3 H. J. Lu
19:29 Re: gcc 3.3 Fergus Henderson
18:02 Re: tablejump index Richard Henderson
17:57 Re: GCC 3.2 Jason Merrill
17:49 Re: GCC 3.2 Jason Merrill
17:35 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Per Bothner
17:34 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes David S. Miller
17:16 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Michael Matz
16:59 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes H. J. Lu
16:55 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Michael Matz
16:47 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Mark Mitchell
16:40 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap broken Daniel Egger
16:21 Re: gcc 3.3 H. J. Lu
16:17 Re: gcc 3.3 Jim Wilson
16:14 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Geoff Keating
16:10 Re: [Gcl-devel] ia64 and garbage collection David Mosberger
16:00 Re: [Gcl-devel] ia64 and garbage collection Jim Wilson
15:56 Re: Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes H. J. Lu
15:49 Weird x86 Linux/GNU crashes Mark Mitchell
14:41 Re: gcc 3.3 Fergus Henderson
14:11 Re: [Gcl-devel] ia64 and garbage collection Camm Maguire
14:10 Re: powerpc-linux bootstrap broken David Edelsohn
14:06 powerpc-linux bootstrap broken Daniel Egger
13:22 generic simd and c++ Andrew Pinski
13:21 We buy used Apple equipment chris
12:12 Re: ia64 and garbage collection Jim Wilson
12:07 Re: missing gcc_eh Carlos Ordonez
11:52 undefined symbol: DW.ref.__gxx_personality_v0 Peter Bienstman
11:36 gcc 3.3 Chris M. Hickman
11:18 Re: ia64 and garbage collection David Mosberger
10:38 ia64 and garbage collection Andrew Haley
10:33 ia64 and garbage collection Camm Maguire
09:46 Re: SIMPLE and fat pointers Steven Bosscher
09:43 Another bug report regarding ABI problems. Andreas Jaeger
09:13 Re: dejagnu testcase question Devang Patel
09:10 Re: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain H. J. Lu
09:08 Re: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain Neil Booth
09:07 Re: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain H. J. Lu
09:02 Re: dejagnu testcase question Neil Booth
09:00 Re: dejagnu testcase question Devang Patel
08:46 Re: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain Neil Booth
08:22 RE: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain France, George (LKG)
08:19 [Fwd: Re: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain] Mike Cleary
08:15 Re: missing gcc_eh Andreas Jaeger
08:13 Successful build on HPUX 11.00 (C, C++, Fortran, Java) Bert Deknuydt
08:05 Re: missing gcc_eh Carlos Ordonez
08:05 Re: missing gcc_eh Carlos Ordonez
07:38 Re: missing gcc_eh Andreas Jaeger
07:17 Re: missing gcc_eh Paolo Carlini
07:02 missing gcc_eh Carlos Ordonez
06:49 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
05:50 Re: Porting GCC without a working assembler and need for libgcc andother libraries Michael Matz
05:08 XFree86 4.2.0 vs gcc 3.1.1 on ppc Jack Howarth
04:37 Porting GCC without a working assembler and need for libgcc and other libraries Etienne Fortin
04:06 tablejump index Momchil Velikov
03:31 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
03:30 Web search only matches the subject??? Joern Rennecke
03:23 Re: [harmingeon@matrix-vision.de: 404@http://gcc.gnu.org/java/download.html] Gerald Pfeifer
02:09 Successful build on Irix 6.5.16m (C, C++, Fortran, Java) Bert Deknuydt

July 29, 2002
23:22 Re: dejagnu testcase question Neil Booth
23:16 Re: dejagnu testcase question Neil Booth
21:30 Re: X86-64 manuals? Andreas Jaeger
20:45 Re: X86-64 manuals? Tim Prince
18:46 Re: Hitachi HD6303 target. Kai Henningsen
17:53 dejagnu testcase question Devang Patel
17:22 gcc-ss-20020729 is now available gccadmin
16:46 Re: use of alloca in function prologue Richard Henderson
16:32 Re: GCC 3.2 Jason Merrill
16:30 Re: bootstrapping with profiling feedback? Nix
15:13 [harmingeon@matrix-vision.de: 404@http://gcc.gnu.org/java/download.html] Brett Smith
14:25 X86-64 manuals? Guillermo Ballester Valor
11:45 Re: additional gcc errors Aldy Hernandez
10:51 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Roger Sayle
10:48 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Roger Sayle
10:42 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Roger Sayle
10:27 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Graham Stott
10:20 Re: bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain Neil Booth
10:19 Exclusive Merchant Account Leads *FRESH* aoncgoodwin
10:08 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu John David Anglin
09:17 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
08:48 Successful build on Tru64 4.0g (C, C++, Fortran, Java) Bert Deknuydt
08:38 RE: libstdc++ support for H8300-elf in gcc 3.1.1 Mark Mitchell
08:36 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Mark Mitchell
08:36 Re: gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Roger Sayle
08:33 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Mark Mitchell
08:19 GNAT3.14p & GNAT/GCC3 subprogram renaming in private library units Vadim Godunko
08:03 Successful build (gcc 3.1.1, i586-pc-linux-gnu, Debian 3.0 sarge) Tamas Nagy
08:02 Re: additional gcc errors David Edelsohn
08:01 RE: libstdc++ support for H8300-elf in gcc 3.1.1 Nitin Gupta, Noida
07:57 Successful build (gcc 3.1.1, Debian 3.0/sarge) Tamas Nagy
07:28 g++ error in gcc-3_0-branch package Mike Cleary
06:53 gcc bootstrap broken on i686-linux-gnu Andreas Jaeger
06:06 gcc 3.1.1 failure to compile Bill Walker
05:29 bitmap.o error on alpha build of basic toolchain bemis
05:00 Re: Broken web page URL/link Gerald Pfeifer
04:42 Re: "return" expander Momchil Velikov
04:26 Re: "return" expander Bernd Schmidt
04:23 Re: Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Gerald Pfeifer
04:21 Re: Wrong link on Web page Gerald Pfeifer
04:03 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Gerald Pfeifer

July 28, 2002
23:08 re: additional gcc errors Jack Howarth
22:31 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Andreas Jaeger
22:30 Segmentation Fault Hermione Granger
21:47 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Mark Mitchell
21:35 Re: I need help Nathan Sidwell
21:32 Re: Broken link Mark Mitchell
21:27 Re: I need help Tim Prince
21:21 Broken web page URL/link D. Stimits
19:30 I need help Hermione Granger
18:24 Passing arguments to emit_library_call qubits
18:21 Accessing addresses of objects qubits
13:08 Re: GCC 3.2 Toon Moene
10:24 Re: libstdc++ support for H8300-elf in gcc 3.1.1 Mark Mitchell
09:52 Re: GCC 3.2 Mark Mitchell
09:40 _alloca problem on compling gcc for sunos4.1.1 poml
05:57 Successful Build, GCC 3.1.1, NetBSD 1.5.3 i386 Nils O." Selåsdal
04:50 Broken link Felix Wiemann
04:11 help: gcc 2.95.2.1 ignored --program-prefix Adam Katz
01:51 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Richard Zidlicky
00:08 Re: Should mainline be 3.3 now? Andreas Jaeger

July 27, 2002
22:19 successful build of gcc3.1.1 Adam Katz
19:29 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 John David Anglin
18:50 Should mainline be 3.3 now? H. J. Lu
18:32 Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1? H. J. Lu
17:49 A Link to Your Website, http://gcc.gnu.org/java/, Now Included inthe GPL'd Database of the Loads of Linux Links Project Barbara E. Irwin
17:17 Re: "return" expander Momchil Velikov
16:38 Re: "return" expander Momchil Velikov
16:26 "return" expander Momchil Velikov
16:15 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 John David Anglin
16:06 Re: Reachable code discarded Momchil Velikov
15:18 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Richard Henderson
15:18 Re: GCC 3.2 Jakub Jelinek
15:13 Re: Reachable code discarded Richard Henderson
15:07 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
15:05 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
15:04 Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1? Richard Henderson
15:03 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Richard Henderson
14:54 Re: GCC 3.2 Benjamin Kosnik
14:38 additional gcc errors Jack Howarth
14:10 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Richard Henderson
12:59 Re: GCC 3.2 Jakub Jelinek
12:35 Re: G77 question (re: libg2c) Andrew Pinski
12:31 Re: G77 question (re: libg2c) Toon Moene
12:08 G77 question (re: libg2c) Gregory Z
07:35 Re: GCC 3.2 Franz Sirl
06:03 libstdc++ support for H8300-elf in gcc 3.1.1 Nitin Gupta, Noida
05:59 use of alloca in function prologue Mike Lerwill
05:54 Wrong link on Web page l.bardet
03:30 Re: ICE building glibc-2.2.5 using m68k-linux gcc-3.1 Richard Zidlicky
01:46 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Andreas Jaeger
01:43 Gcc 3.1.1 Robert McNulty Junior
01:43 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Andreas Jaeger
01:30 e500 API compatability patch [ignore] Aldy Hernandez
01:28 Re: 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Phil Edwards
01:01 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Released Robert Schiele
00:56 3.2/3.3 changes for scripts on gcc.gnu.org Andreas Jaeger

July 26, 2002
23:56 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Pop Sébastian
23:42 Re: Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
23:25 Broken link in http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html Juan Altmayer Pizzorno
22:16 Broken link on http://gcc.gnu.org/releases.html page Terry Flannery
22:09 Successful build - GCC 3.1.1; Cygwin 1.3.12-2 Terry Flannery
21:20 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
20:21 Successful Build, GCC 3.1.1, custom SMP Linux System Scott Robert Ladd
20:16 Successful Build, GCC 3.1.1, Debian 3.0r0 SPARC Scott Robert Ladd
19:35 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu John David Anglin
17:46 Re: GCC 3.2 Zack Weinberg
17:23 Re: creating new pattern recognition in myproc.md Segher Boessenkool
17:19 FW: Congratulations (was: GCC 3.2) Scott Robert Ladd
16:35 Built GCC 3.1.1 on i686-pc-linux-gnu Nils O." Selåsdal
16:17 Re: GCC 3.2 Mark Mitchell
16:09 Re: GCC 3.2 Joe Buck
15:56 GCC 3.2 Mark Mitchell
15:52 GCC 3.1.1 Released Mark Mitchell
15:01 RE: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Valle, Adam
14:57 Re: Move cpp options handling to front ends? Zack Weinberg
14:51 Re: gcc2.95 Andrew Pinski
14:47 gcc2.95 lartey
13:35 RE: Gcc 3.1.1 and gcc-3.1 Robert McNulty Junior
12:39 Re: Gcc 3.1.1 and gcc-3.1 Andrew Pinski
12:14 Gcc 3.1.1 and gcc-3.1 Robert McNulty Junior
10:42 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 John David Anglin
09:16 Re: -pg option Will Cohen
09:12 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Neil Booth
08:54 -pg option Reza Roboubi
08:50 Reachable code discarded Momchil Velikov
08:37 Re: Reload question Mark Mitchell
08:32 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c onsparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Andreas Schwab
07:59 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Joern Rennecke
07:05 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
05:14 Re: ICE building glibc-2.2.5 using m68k-linux gcc-3.1 Richard Zidlicky
04:18 Re: Reload question Bernd Schmidt
03:20 .stack section in binary generated by sh-elf-gcc Nitin Gupta, Noida
03:04 PATCH Re: Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Jason Merrill
01:56 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Richard Earnshaw

July 25, 2002
23:23 Re: Reload question Mark Mitchell
22:53 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Robert Schiele
22:07 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 John David Anglin
21:21 Re: mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Daniel Berlin
20:57 Question on connection queue Chin Hai
19:41 mainline bootstrap failure in bitmap.c on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
19:37 Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1? H. J. Lu
18:04 Re: ICE building glibc-2.2.5 using m68k-linux gcc-3.1 Richard Henderson
16:26 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Per Bothner
16:19 GCC 3.1 Branch Freeze Mark Mitchell
16:03 Re: release notes for gcc 3.1.1 Joe Buck
15:45 bootstrapping with profiling feedback? Jeff Garzik
15:28 Re: Move cpp options handling to front ends? Neil Booth
15:21 Re: Move cpp options handling to front ends? Zack Weinberg
15:19 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Joern Rennecke
14:52 Move cpp options handling to front ends? Neil Booth
14:51 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu John David Anglin
14:49 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Joern Rennecke
14:30 -pg option Reza Roboubi
14:24 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Joern Rennecke
14:20 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
14:06 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Joern Rennecke
13:57 Re: release notes for gcc 3.1.1 Gerald Pfeifer
13:47 GCC on MP/RAS from NCR Dave Skura
13:47 GCC on MP/RAS from NCR Dave Skura
13:32 Undefined reference to __divsi3 Kishorekumar D
13:25 Re: Reload question Bernd Schmidt
13:18 Re: SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Robert Lipe
12:33 Re: ICE building glibc-2.2.5 using m68k-linux gcc-3.1 Peter Barada
12:32 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
12:29 Re: neil's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp tm
12:27 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
12:16 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
11:52 Re: neil's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp Neil Booth
11:48 neil's lock in /cvs/gcc/gcc/gcc/cp tm
11:40 Re: Address of a cast expression in C++ Gabriel Dos Reis
11:33 SCO OpenServer Build status for GCC 2.95 Valle, Adam
11:25 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Geoff Keating
11:24 gcc manual alx_k
11:22 Re: Reload question Richard Kenner
11:22 Address of a cast expression in C++ Matt Austern
11:13 Reload question Mark Mitchell
11:01 Re: ICE building glibc-2.2.5 using m68k-linux gcc-3.1 Richard Zidlicky
10:56 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Richard Henderson
10:18 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Richard Henderson
10:01 Re: Macos X build GCC 3.1 Andreas Tobler
09:51 release notes for gcc 3.1.1 Joe Buck
09:46 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Gabriel Dos Reis
09:26 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Mark Mitchell
09:24 Macos X build GCC 3.1 Matthew J. Waller
09:15 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
09:04 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Prerelease Mattias Engdegård
08:54 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
08:17 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Per Bothner
08:03 Re: New and exception Joe Buck
07:34 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Andreas Schwab
07:08 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu John David Anglin
06:49 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Momchil Velikov
06:10 Cross Compilation Failed yoshi ge
05:43 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Joern Rennecke
05:38 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Momchil Velikov
04:29 FW: H8300 optimization Dhananjay R. Deshpande
04:24 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Momchil Velikov
04:09 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Joern Rennecke
03:53 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Momchil Velikov
03:51 rsync access to binutils and gdb CVS tree Jan-Benedict Glaw
03:06 Re: Unreviewed patch / {PATCH] Do not override configure decision about inhibit_libc Joern Rennecke
02:56 Re: curiosity about new-regalloc-branch Michael Matz
02:54 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Momchil Velikov
02:36 Re: Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Andreas Schwab
02:32 creating new pattern recognition in myproc.md Pierre Mallard
02:02 Re: SPECfp95: Huge performance loss with -fnew-ra? Michael Matz
01:01 Unreviewed patch Momchil Velikov
00:09 Undefined behavior in 950605-1.c Momchil Velikov

July 24, 2002
22:44 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Mark Mitchell
21:48 curiosity about new-regalloc-branch Brad Lucier
20:27 Re: gcc-3.1 build fails on Solaris-2.7 with --with_gnu_ld Jeff Sturm
18:12 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:42 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Richard Henderson
16:52 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) Michael Eager
16:30 Re: SPECfp95: Huge performance loss with -fnew-ra? Diego Novillo
16:05 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
16:04 Re: New and exception Robert Dewar
15:53 Re: New and exception Joe Buck
15:44 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
15:22 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu John David Anglin
15:15 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
14:51 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Geoff Keating
14:25 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
14:11 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
13:57 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
13:38 Re: [fix] for: ra-colorize.c:1068: `inv_reg_alloc_order' undeclared Michael Matz
13:30 Re: [fix] for: ra-colorize.c:1068: `inv_reg_alloc_order' undeclared John David Anglin
13:14 [fix] for: ra-colorize.c:1068: `inv_reg_alloc_order' undeclared Michael Matz
12:50 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
12:45 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
12:41 Re: compiling "hacked" code Ben Elliston
12:33 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
12:16 ra-colorize.c:1068: `inv_reg_alloc_order' undeclared John David Anglin
11:38 Re: SIMPLE and fat pointers Diego Novillo
11:34 QNX Neutrino mips PIC - RFC Graeme Peterson
11:09 [tree-ssa-branch] New ChangeLog.tree-ssa Diego Novillo
11:01 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
10:11 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Prerelease Joe Buck
09:42 Re: compiling "hacked" code Mike Stump
09:34 Re: compiling "hacked" code Reza Roboubi
09:07 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Steve Ellcey
09:01 compiling "hacked" code Reza Roboubi
07:52 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Diego Novillo
07:52 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Diego Novillo
07:26 Re: New and exception Jamie Lokier
07:19 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Daniel Berlin
07:17 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Gabriel Dos Reis
07:09 [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-07-21 Diego Novillo
05:58 gcc-3.1 build fails on Solaris-2.7 with --with_gnu_ld Christophe Lyon
05:17 Re: PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES nonstandard ? Andreas Schwab
04:53 PROMOTE_PROTOTYPES nonstandard ? Momchil Velikov
03:35 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
03:22 Software required to build/maintain GCC Richard Kenner
03:01 successfully built and installed GCC Bernd Jendrissek
01:50 Re: Error on GCC 3.2 Changes page Gerald Pfeifer
01:42 solaris 2.6 bootstrap failure Andreas Tobler
01:05 Re: small typo in gcc3.2 page Gerald Pfeifer
00:29 Re: "3.1" should read "3.2" Gerald Pfeifer
00:22 Re: PATCH for Re: Broken link on gcc.gnu.org frontpage Gerald Pfeifer

July 23, 2002
23:40 tree dump utility sathis
23:17 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Per Bothner
23:12 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Martin Pool
22:31 Re: gcc 3.1 branch slowdown? Loren James Rittle
22:29 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Geoff Keating
21:57 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Per Bothner
21:55 bootstraping 3.2 on sparc-*-linux and sparc-sun-solaris2.8 fails Robert Schiele
21:44 Re: needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Geoff Keating
20:06 needless deep recursion in gt-c-decl.h Per Bothner
19:50 GCC 3.1.1 Prerelease Mark Mitchell
19:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Mark Mitchell
18:29 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Richard Henderson
18:21 Re: libstdc++ licensing question Robert Dewar
18:20 Re: feature request - unused arguments Joe Buck
17:48 Re: feature request - unused arguments Steven_Shaw
17:48 Re: libstdc++ licensing question Phil Edwards
17:22 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
17:19 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
16:41 Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1? Richard Henderson
15:58 Re: gcc 3.1 branch slowdown? Loren James Rittle
15:25 Re: Unused macros warning? David O'Brien
15:03 Error on GCC 3.2 Changes page Joseph Edward Miele
12:13 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Fergus Henderson
12:01 Re: problem building GCC on PowerPC wiht AltiVec enabled Mike Stump
11:34 Re: PATCH for Re: Broken link on gcc.gnu.org frontpage Mike Stump
11:28 "3.1" should read "3.2" sbishop
11:26 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Mike Stump
10:57 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Richard Henderson
10:21 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Andrew Haley
10:19 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Tom Tromey
10:18 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
10:06 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
09:34 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Pop Sébastian
08:15 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Ben Elliston
08:13 small typo in gcc3.2 page Tino Meinen
07:59 libstdc++ licensing question Michael Fimin
07:28 Re: Apple's GCC 3.1 Stan Shebs
07:20 Re: Hello caroline.turen@captivmail.com
06:28 Re: Who approves write-after-approval folks? Gerald Pfeifer
06:18 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Jan Hubicka
06:15 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Diego Novillo
06:12 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Toon Moene
06:06 Re: Suspicious code in assign_parms Momchil Velikov
06:04 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Diego Novillo
05:52 PATCH for Re: Broken link on gcc.gnu.org frontpage Gerald Pfeifer
05:46 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Fergus Henderson
05:44 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Alexandre Oliva
05:35 Re: problem building GCC on PowerPC wiht AltiVec enabled Daniel Egger
05:22 Re: Apple's GCC 3.1 Daniel Berlin
05:19 Re: gcc-3.2 website permission error Gerald Pfeifer
05:18 Apple's GCC 3.1 Gerald Pfeifer
05:15 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Gerald Pfeifer
04:57 Re: mainline bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Andreas Jaeger
04:48 Re: mainline bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Toon Moene
04:13 Re: feature request - unused arguments Momchil Velikov
03:34 Re: feature request - unused arguments Robert Dewar
03:13 Re: SPECfp95: Huge performance loss with -fnew-ra? Michael Matz
02:59 Re: problem building GCC on PowerPC wiht AltiVec enabled Franz Sirl
02:44 Re: gcc-3.2 website permission error Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
02:44 Re: question about __builtin_prefetch for gcc 3.1 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
02:30 Re: feature request - unused arguments Gerald Pfeifer
02:29 Re: problem building GCC on PowerPC wiht AltiVec enabled Alan Modra
02:12 problem building GCC on PowerPC wiht AltiVec enabled Ilan Finci
02:10 Re: Suspicious code in assign_parms Momchil Velikov
02:04 g++ and -gcoff chriscard1
01:54 question about __builtin_prefetch for gcc 3.1 Ravikiran G Thirumalai
00:42 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Ross Smith
00:18 feature request - unused arguments Steven_Shaw

July 22, 2002
22:55 Re: Unused macros warning? Zack Weinberg
22:17 heads up, upcoming ppc variant (e500, booke32) Aldy Hernandez
21:25 Re: mainline bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 David S. Miller
21:09 mainline bootstrap failure on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
21:09 Hook in gcc Sathiskanna
19:22 Re: -mno-fancy-math-387 doesn't work with -mpentium3 Roger Sayle
19:04 Re: SPECfp95: Huge performance loss with -fnew-ra? Daniel Berlin
18:58 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
18:34 List of versions of required software to build GCC Richard Kenner
18:04 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Andreas Jaeger
18:03 SPECfp95: Huge performance loss with -fnew-ra? Diego Novillo
17:55 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Andreas Jaeger
17:30 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Martin Pool
17:26 gcc-ss-20020722 is now available gccadmin
17:25 draft 3.1.1 release notes (PRs fixed in 3.1.1) Joe Buck
17:22 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Martin Pool
17:01 Re: Parse error Joe Buck
16:56 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Aldy Hernandez
16:42 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Martin Pool
14:33 Re: -march=pentium3 bugs on mainline Kelley Cook
14:21 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Diego Novillo
14:19 Re: Parse error Nathan Sidwell
14:15 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Richard Henderson
14:02 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Diego Novillo
13:52 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Aldy Hernandez
13:47 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Diego Novillo
13:41 Re: Parse error Matt Austern
13:35 Re: Parse error Andrew Pinski
13:26 Parse error Matt Austern
13:25 Re: distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Aldy Hernandez
13:21 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Guillermo Ballester Valor
13:11 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Jan Hubicka
13:10 ICE building glibc-2.2.5 using m68k-linux gcc-3.1 Peter Barada
13:03 prob with gcj documentation Brent Smith
12:53 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Toon Moene
12:33 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
12:23 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Jan Hubicka
12:13 Re: Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1? H. J. Lu
12:04 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Michael Ritzert
12:02 gcc-3.2 website permission error Mats Rynge
11:52 Re: GCC for MC9S12 Stephane Carrez
11:29 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Michael Ritzert
10:39 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes David Edelsohn
09:34 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Joe Buck
08:58 Suspicious code in assign_parms Momchil Velikov
08:32 Re: gcc 3.1 lartey
07:55 Re: where is tree dump utility Diego Novillo
07:35 Re: -mno-fancy-math-387 doesn't work with -mpentium3 in gcc 3.1 H. J. Lu
07:21 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Daniel Berlin
07:18 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Jason Merrill
07:16 Re: Unused macros warning? Paul Koning
07:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
07:10 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Nathan Sidwell
06:23 GCC for MC9S12 Padfield David-DPADFIE1
05:22 Re: PATCH: remove company links from index.html and news.html Gerald Pfeifer
05:11 Re: PATCH: remove company links from index.html and news.html Joseph S. Myers
04:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
04:13 bootstraping 3.2 on sparc*-*-* fails Robert Schiele
03:19 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions (test case included!) Jan Hubicka
03:17 Re: -mno-fancy-math-387 doesn't work with -mpentium3 in gcc 3.1 Jan Hubicka
03:07 Re: PATCH: remove company links from index.html and news.html Gerald Pfeifer
02:42 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
02:24 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Michael Matz
01:58 distributed compilation with gcc: distcc Martin Pool
01:30 Symbol Table yoshi ge
01:02 Re: Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Michael Ritzert
00:25 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
00:13 Re: Can't use '-a' option in gcc 3.1 (x86) Fergus Henderson
00:03 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Ross Smith

July 21, 2002
23:53 where is tree dump utility Sathiskanna
23:45 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Phil Edwards
23:34 Unused macros warning? Neil Booth
23:20 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Daniel Berlin
23:06 -mno-fancy-math-387 doesn't work with -mpentium3 in gcc 3.1 H. J. Lu
22:56 Is gcc.c-torture/execute/20020307-2.c supposed to pass on gcc 3.1? H. J. Lu
22:44 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Andreas Jaeger
22:43 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Daniel Berlin
22:42 -march=pentium3 bugs on mainline H. J. Lu
22:41 where is the data Sathiskanna
22:35 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Daniel Berlin
22:04 Memory consumption for bootstrap explodes Gerald Pfeifer
20:39 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
20:30 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Christopher Faylor
18:14 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
18:04 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
17:32 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Richard Henderson
17:18 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Mark Mitchell
17:16 Re: DI support in libgcc2 Richard Henderson
17:04 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Gareth Pearce
17:03 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Phil Edwards
16:38 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
16:20 static anonymous union within class Mad Hatter
16:00 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Mark Mitchell
15:32 Re: Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go? Paul Brook
15:25 i586-pc-linux-gnu Colin Martel
15:25 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
15:15 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Jason Merrill
15:14 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
15:07 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
15:05 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
14:56 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Mark Mitchell
14:51 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Gabriel Dos Reis
14:31 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Mark Mitchell
14:23 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Tim Prince
14:20 gcc Huidong Yu
14:07 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Tim Prince
13:59 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Mark Mitchell
13:30 Re: DI support in libgcc2 Hartmut Schirmer
13:26 Broken link on gcc.gnu.org frontpage Daniel Burrows
11:44 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Jan Hubicka
11:42 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Jan Hubicka
11:32 Re: gcc 3.1 Paolo Carlini
11:24 gcc 3.1 lartey
11:09 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Steven Bosscher
11:03 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
10:59 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Daniel Berlin
10:50 Someone different.... Janet
10:43 Re: mainline performance Brad Lucier
10:27 Re: Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go? Steven Bosscher
10:01 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Richard Henderson
09:54 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Richard Henderson
09:43 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Andreas Jaeger
09:15 Re: Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go? Daniel Berlin
08:59 Re: m68k/m68k.md typo? Andreas Schwab
07:58 How effective is -m[arch|cpu]=pentieum3 on gcc 3.1 branch? H. J. Lu
07:55 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
07:22 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Andreas Jaeger
07:21 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Tim Prince
07:21 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Andreas Jaeger
07:19 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Gareth Pearce
07:06 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Pop Sébastian
06:28 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Andreas Jaeger
06:20 Re: mainline performance Kaveh R. Ghazi
06:07 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
05:26 Re: -msse producing sse2 instructions Andreas Jaeger
04:41 m68k/m68k.md typo? Richard Zidlicky
02:28 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
01:47 Re: C++ throw clause checking in function declarations at compile time Gabriel Dos Reis
01:28 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Steven Bosscher
01:23 -msse producing sse2 instructions Dylan Cuthbert
01:16 Re: mainline performance Andreas Jaeger
01:07 Re: mainline performance Neil Booth
01:04 C++ throw clause checking in function declarations at compile time Akos Maroy
00:41 Re: Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go? Steven Bosscher
00:41 Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux? David Ronis
00:41 Re: Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux? David Ronis
00:13 Re: mainline performance Andreas Jaeger
00:09 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Andreas Jaeger

July 20, 2002
23:39 i586-pc-linux-gnu Colin Martel
22:17 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Richard Henderson
22:15 Re: mainline performance David S. Miller
22:11 Re: mainline performance David Edelsohn
22:05 Re: mainline performance David S. Miller
20:50 Re: Is -fnew-ra ready for real testing? Brad Lucier
19:47 Re: mainline performance Roger Sayle
18:54 mainline performance David S. Miller
18:24 Re: Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go? Daniel Berlin
17:33 Where's the Steengaard stuff supposed to go? Steven Bosscher
15:20 Re: Is -fnew-ra ready for real testing? David Edelsohn
15:06 Re: gcc 3.1 branch slowdown? David Edelsohn
13:59 Re: Is -fnew-ra ready for real testing? Brad Lucier
13:58 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Richard Henderson
13:51 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Richard Henderson
13:50 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Richard Henderson
13:36 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Neil Booth
13:19 Re: Problem in compiling libffi as multilib Jeff Sturm
13:06 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Steven Bosscher
12:33 Re: Is -fnew-ra ready for real testing? Michael Matz
12:17 Re: Can't use '-a' option in gcc 3.1 (x86) Guillermo Ballester Valor
12:12 Can't use '-a' option in gcc 3.1 (x86) Guillermo Ballester Valor
12:06 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Nick Ing-Simmons
12:05 Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Jason Merrill
11:59 Re: [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Jason Merrill
11:59 gcc 3.1 branch slowdown? H. J. Lu
11:48 undefined symbols! Stefan Frehse
11:47 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Richard Henderson
11:43 Re: Hitachi HD6303 target Andrew Haley
11:42 i586-pc-linux-gnu Colin Martel
11:41 Re: Language-independent functions-as-trees representation Per Bothner
11:24 gcc reload problem thomas joseph
07:52 ÓʾÖϵͳ ϵͳ¹ÜÀíÔ±
07:10 Re: 3rd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Gwenole Beauchesne
06:05 Re: weird error from binary gcc-2.95.3-sol8-sparc-local Gerald Pfeifer
02:13 =?GB2312?B?u/nS8svjt6jIw7j20NS7r0ZMQVNItPPP1Mnxzf4=?= e3@163.com.hk

July 19, 2002
18:46 FREE A/C CHECK AT A/C AUTHORITY AND DINNER AT NEW Robert More
18:46 FREE A/C CHECK AT A/C AUTHORITY AND DINNER AT NEW Robert More
17:03 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Richard Henderson
16:35 GNATS status for 3.1 Joe Buck
15:35 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Richard Henderson
15:26 weird error from binary gcc-2.95.3-sol8-sparc-local Richard Pfeiffer
14:29 Re: Hitachi HD6303 target tm
13:31 Re: Confusion Andrew Pinski
12:56 Confusion Clayton, Curt J.
12:56 Re: Hitachi HD6303 target. Stefan Heinzmann
12:56 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
12:14 Is -fnew-ra ready for real testing? Brad Lucier
11:36 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) H. J. Lu
11:15 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) Daniel Jacobowitz
11:10 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) H. J. Lu
11:03 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) Daniel Jacobowitz
11:02 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
11:00 KEMET's Virus scan system detected a violation in a document you authored. Syspage
10:55 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) H. J. Lu
10:50 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) Daniel Jacobowitz
10:46 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) H. J. Lu
10:43 Re: PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) Daniel Jacobowitz
10:40 PATCH: Add --with-arch=cpu (Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default?) H. J. Lu
10:00 Re: DI support in libgcc2 Richard Henderson
09:54 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Richard Henderson
09:36 Re: 3rd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
09:02 Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default? H. J. Lu
08:27 Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default? Richard Earnshaw
08:25 Re: Wrong insn length attribute Richard Earnshaw
08:24 Re: Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU bydefault? Philip Blundell
08:14 Should gcc configurted for CPU to generate code for CPU by default? H. J. Lu
08:02 Wrong insn length attribute Momchil Velikov
07:55 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? David Edelsohn
07:52 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Daniel Berlin
07:40 Re: Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
07:24 Problem in compiling libffi as multilib Bo Thorsen
06:16 Re: Who approves write-after-approval folks? Hans-Peter Nilsson
05:40 DI support in libgcc2 Hartmut Schirmer
05:30 Re: Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux? Joern Rennecke
05:27 Re: Updated link Gerald Pfeifer
05:03 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Michael Matz
04:58 Re: Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux? Alexandre Oliva
04:33 How tree in GCC Sathiskanna
04:23 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Michael Matz
03:25 Re: Add new CPP arithmetic warning? Joseph S. Myers
02:09 Documentation for Libraries Uwe Hahn
00:05 Re: GCC Maggie
00:01 Re: 3rd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Martin Kahlert

July 18, 2002
23:47 Re: Add new CPP arithmetic warning? Neil Booth
23:14 Re: Release Plan Updates David O'Brien
22:13 GCC stephen miller
20:49 RE: Problem building gcc 3.1 on Windows Billinghurst, David (CRTS)
19:29 Problem building gcc 3.1 on Windows Jason Bellenger
18:29 Re: SIMPLE NOT expressions Diego Novillo
17:00 Updated link Robert Davies
16:53 Re: SIMPLE NOT expressions Paul Brook
15:11 Re: Who approves write-after-approval folks? Joe Buck
15:05 Re: Who approves write-after-approval folks? Joe Buck
15:00 Re: Who approves write-after-approval folks? Neil Booth
14:32 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Richard Henderson
14:28 Re: signed gcc downloads Zach Bagnall
14:14 Needed: volunteer for free BIOS on IBM T-21 Richard Stallman
14:11 Re: Who approves write-after-approval folks? Ben Elliston
13:49 Who approves write-after-approval folks? Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:42 Re: SIMPLE NOT expressions Steven Bosscher
13:36 Re: SIMPLE NOT expressions Daniel Berlin
13:19 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Noel Yap
13:14 Re: SIMPLE NOT expressions Steven Bosscher
13:07 Re: SIMPLE NOT expressions Daniel Berlin
13:01 SIMPLE NOT expressions Paul Brook
12:46 Re: Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux? Joern Rennecke
12:42 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Alexey Starovoytov
12:21 3rd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
12:05 The Linux binutils 2.12.90.0.15 is released H. J. Lu
11:56 Re: Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (3.0.4) John David Anglin
11:33 Re: [parisc-linux] Problem building gcc-3.2 (cvs head) on hppa-linux John David Anglin
10:53 Buffer overrun while doing tests like format/c90-printf-1.c on linux? Joern Rennecke
10:45 Re: libstdc++ Joe Buck
10:42 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Joe Buck
09:30 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Pop Sébastian
09:25 Re: [tree-ssa-branch] fortran bootstraps broken Daniel Berlin
08:31 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Diego Novillo
08:25 Re: Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (3.0.4) Janis Johnson
06:50 Re: signed gcc downloads Paul Koning
06:50 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Richard Zidlicky
06:47 [tree-ssa-branch] fortran bootstraps broken Diego Novillo
06:11 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Jan Hubicka
06:08 Re: signed gcc downloads Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
05:52 Successful build on Ultrix/VAX (3.0.4) Bert Deknuydt
04:08 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Michael Matz
02:19 PARTNERSHIP ENGR. TAIWO AJAYI

July 17, 2002
23:45 How to run my own pre-processor. phi
23:08 Re: Add new CPP arithmetic warning? Neil Booth
22:11 Re: Meta-programming, templates and default methods Phil Edwards
19:28 Re: Add new CPP arithmetic warning? Zack Weinberg
18:58 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Daniel Berlin
18:26 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Zack Weinberg
18:12 libstdc++ Katherine.Gowan
17:51 signed gcc downloads Zach Bagnall
17:51 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:25 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
17:09 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Gabriel Dos Reis
17:03 Re: ra-debug.c: why? Daniel Berlin
16:39 ra-debug.c: why? Zack Weinberg
16:31 Hitachi HD6303 target. John Carter
16:26 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
16:20 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Phil Edwards
16:11 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Loren James Rittle
16:02 Add new CPP arithmetic warning? Neil Booth
15:45 input about GCC conference Janis Johnson
15:27 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Alexey Starovoytov
15:01 Re: STL with gcc3 Gabriel Dos Reis
14:56 Re: STL with gcc3 Ji Li
14:39 Re: Mailing list shuffle? Joe Buck
14:39 Re: Mailing list shuffle? Steven Bosscher
14:32 delay removal of deprecated functions by one version? Phil Edwards
14:31 Re: STL with gcc3 Joe Buck
14:23 Re: Mailing list shuffle? Phil Edwards
14:15 Re: STL with gcc3 Phil Edwards
13:14 Re: arguments passed partially in regs and partially in stack Richard Henderson
12:53 GOODLUCK/CONFIDENTIAL OJO IKEDIA
12:52 Helen, AlarIT Inc. Helen Kalyuzhni
12:52 Helen, AlarIT Inc. Helen Kalyuzhni
11:40 Re: STL with gcc3 Matt Austern
11:35 STL with gcc3 Ji Li
11:13 Re: performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit? Robert Schiele
10:08 Re: 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
09:47 Re: 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Kelley Cook
09:25 Re: performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit? Gerald Pfeifer
09:17 Re: libffi problem H. J. Lu
08:32 Fix for PowerPC bootstrap failure unreviewed David Edelsohn
08:21 Re: libffi problem Bo Thorsen
08:19 Re: libffi problem Bo Thorsen
08:15 Re: libffi problem Jeff Sturm
07:45 Re: libffi problem H. J. Lu
07:44 Not exporting symbols when enabling DSO for Apache (1.3.26) using gcc (2.95.3 and 3.0.3) on Soalris 8 - NOTE gcc (3.1) does build correctly. David Loesche
07:09 Re: libffi problem Jeff Sturm
05:26 On GCC builds pete
05:03 arguments passed partially in regs and partially in stack Christophe Lyon
04:53 Re: Help with automake needed Michael Matz
04:40 Re: Compiler gcc Tiemo Krüger - mycable GmbH
04:16 Help with automake needed Bo Thorsen
04:16 libffi problem Bo Thorsen
02:28 define_reservation regexp duplicated in pentium.md for two different reservation names Jonah B Graham
01:43 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Earnshaw
01:29 GCC Compiler Eddie Riby
01:28 Re: g++: a bug or a feature ??? Nathan Sidwell
01:12 g++: a bug or a feature ??? Yzhar Keysar
00:58 Compiler gcc Mathias Bordier
00:24 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Geoff Keating

July 16, 2002
22:48 Re: Mailing list shuffle? Alexandre Oliva
22:45 RE: inerting nop's using the DFA scheduler Danish Samad
22:36 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Richard Henderson
20:34 Como sobrevivir a la crisis Red Fox Systems Latin America
20:17 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Randolph Chung
18:54 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Daniel Jacobowitz
18:34 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] David S. Miller
18:31 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Alexey Starovoytov
18:24 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Denis Zaitsev
18:24 Re: Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Alexey Starovoytov
17:44 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Florian Weimer
17:15 hi qiguai808
16:49 Re: Mailing list shuffle? Colin Douglas Howell
16:44 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Diego Novillo
16:34 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] David S. Miller
15:05 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make H. J. Lu
14:37 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:31 Re: Mailing list shuffle? Joe Buck
14:30 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make H. J. Lu
14:26 Re: new build Janis Johnson
14:25 Re: gcc-3.1 built for powerpc-ibm-aix4.1.5.0 Janis Johnson
14:25 Re: 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Neil Booth
14:25 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Daniel Berlin
14:25 Re: Good GCC build Janis Johnson
14:24 Re: 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
14:18 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make Hans-Peter Nilsson
14:12 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Toon Moene
14:10 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Toon Moene
14:04 Problem bootstrapping on hp-ux (configure bug?) David Sharp
14:02 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Daniel Berlin
13:59 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make H. J. Lu
13:54 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Joern Rennecke
13:53 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make Hans-Peter Nilsson
13:49 Re: [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] David S. Miller
13:45 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Aldy Hernandez
13:43 Mailing list shuffle? Steven Bosscher
13:21 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Richard Henderson
13:14 Re: Indirect C-function calls not sibcall-optimised? Richard Henderson
13:12 [Fwd: GCC2C compiler/converter] Tim Josling
12:41 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Joern Rennecke
12:25 Re: 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Neil Booth
12:11 Re: 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Toon Moene
12:09 Re: Information on GCC Joe Buck
12:04 Re: Policy about ICE on illegal code? Joe Buck
11:51 Alias analysis - does base_alias_check still work ? Toon Moene
11:18 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
11:17 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
11:14 2nd draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
11:04 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Peter Schmid
10:52 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
10:27 __divsi3 Yasir Saeed
10:24 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Matthew Wilcox
10:19 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Randolph Chung
10:01 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem John David Anglin
09:56 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem John David Anglin
09:52 Re: Policy about ICE on illegal code? Andrew Pinski
09:44 Policy about ICE on illegal code? Jack Lloyd
09:16 Re: cc: command not found Anthony Barkley
09:10 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Aldy Hernandez
08:38 cc: command not found Andrew Haley
08:34 cc: command not found Anthony Barkley
07:59 RE: Information on GCC Scott Robert Ladd
07:23 Some warnings with "make" MB
07:15 Some warnings on make MB
07:15 Some errors with make MB
06:40 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Michael Matz
05:48 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
04:43 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Peter Schmid
04:36 RE: Verifying Debug Info. Alex Newman
03:25 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Robert Dewar
03:22 [tree-ssa] Simplifying TARGET_EXPR Jason Merrill
03:15 Re: Information on GCC Gerald Pfeifer
02:44 Re: 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Reichelt
02:08 Re: [parisc-linux] gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Alan Cox
02:07 Re: ra-build failure on solaris 2.6 Andreas Tobler
01:09 ra-build failure on solaris 2.6 Andreas Tobler

July 15, 2002
23:52 Information on GCC Kaustubh Deshmukh
21:57 Re: gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Randolph Chung
21:56 gcc-3.[02] alignment problem Randolph Chung
21:52 Re: Indirect C-function calls not sibcall-optimised? Andreas Bauer
21:44 gcc-error arun%anwsi.com@mail3.srivari.n
18:15 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Daniel Berlin
17:30 gcc-ss-20020715 is now available gccadmin
17:03 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Daniel Berlin
17:00 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Falk Hueffner
16:46 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Daniel Berlin
16:46 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Daniel Berlin
16:19 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Falk Hueffner
15:57 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Daniel Berlin
15:50 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Falk Hueffner
15:41 Re: -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Daniel Berlin
15:37 1st draft: PRs fixed in 3.1.1 Joe Buck
15:33 -fnew-ra -- which architectures? Falk Hueffner
14:59 Re: Indirect C-function calls not sibcall-optimised? Richard Henderson
14:33 Re: Verifying Debug Info. Richard Henderson
13:30 Something you can not miss ! net-empire
13:30 Something you can not miss ! net-empire
10:53 Re: g++: a bug or a feature ??? Gokhan Kisacikoglu
10:46 g++: a bug or a feature ??? Yzhar Keysar
09:51 Re: Release Plan Updates Stan Shebs
09:48 Re: Release Plan Updates H. J. Lu
08:32 Re: Release Plan Updates Phil Edwards
07:53 Re: Release Plan Updates David Edelsohn
07:48 Re: recog.c apply_change_group ret zero if num_changes is 0. Jan Hubicka
07:44 Re: Release Plan Updates H. J. Lu
07:42 Re: Release Plan Updates H. J. Lu
06:40 Re: Vector modes Daniel Berlin
06:40 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Daniel Berlin
05:53 Vector modes Ian Dall
05:37 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Andrew Haley
05:24 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Daniel Berlin
04:32 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Andrew Haley
04:05 Re: recog.c apply_change_group ret zero if num_changes is 0. Joern Rennecke
03:39 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Robert Dewar
02:56 gcc 3.1 installation trouble Chiu, PCM (Peter)
02:13 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Earnshaw
01:33 Re: Release Plan Updates Nathan Sidwell

July 14, 2002
23:24 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Geoff Keating
23:15 Re: Release Plan Updates Mark Mitchell
23:15 Indirect C-function calls not sibcall-optimised? Andreas Bauer
23:12 Re: Release Plan Updates David S. Miller
23:09 Re: Release Plan Updates Mark Mitchell
23:00 Re: Release Plan Updates David S. Miller
22:49 Re: Release Plan Updates Andreas Jaeger
22:30 Re: Release Plan Updates Mark Mitchell
22:25 Re: Release Plan Updates Jakub Jelinek
22:18 Re: gcc-3.1 make problem Andrew Pinski
22:15 Re: Release Plan Updates Mark Mitchell
22:13 gcc-3.1 make problem Zhou Jingtao
22:03 Re: Release Plan Updates Andreas Jaeger
21:14 GCC 3.1.1 Mark Mitchell
21:08 Release Plan Updates Mark Mitchell
20:22 Re: Vector modes under hppa64-hpu Aldy Hernandez
15:04 Generating user-defined function calls in RTL qubits
14:00 new build Todd Kokoszka
11:32 generating calls Per Fransson
10:29 RE: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Michael Matz
10:26 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Michael Matz
06:52 Re: PCH Noel Yap
06:16 Re: GCC internals Michael S. Zick
03:18 GCC internals David Raingeard
02:46 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Pop Sébastian
01:57 Meta-programming, templates and default methods Niklas Een

July 13, 2002
18:57 RE: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Duraid Madina
18:42 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Robert Dewar
18:17 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Daniel Jacobowitz
17:48 RE: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Duraid Madina
17:32 Re: please subscribe me to the gcc mailing list Farrell Farahbod
15:39 Re: c++ implies -fno-builtin -- why?? Paul Koning
14:53 please subscribe me to the gcc mailing list Farrell Farahbod
12:38 Re: cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? Nicholas Wourms
10:50 Re: cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? Christopher Faylor
10:32 Re: cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? Nathanael Nerode
09:44 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
08:39 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Michael Matz
07:37 Re: Cross target status Andreas Jaeger
06:44 Re: SIMPLE and fat pointers Richard Kenner
06:36 Re: SIMPLE and fat pointers Steven Bosscher
05:50 Cross target status Andreas Jaeger
04:58 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Kaveh R. Ghazi
04:48 Re: Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Daniel Berlin
01:56 Re: TR : (Problems) Building a standalone executable for ARM Shane Nay
00:45 Register Pressure in Instruction Level Parallelism (fwd) Zack Weinberg

July 12, 2002
21:09 Re: cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? Christopher Faylor
19:59 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
19:13 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Kaveh R. Ghazi
19:12 Re: c++ implies -fno-builtin -- why?? Roger Sayle
16:26 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Robert Dewar
16:23 gcc-3.1 built for powerpc-ibm-aix4.1.5.0 Kevin S. Millikin
16:17 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
16:09 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Geoff Keating
14:57 Vector modes under hppa64-hpux John David Anglin
14:54 symble table for RTL representation Liang-Fang Chao
14:07 Re: New and exception Tim Hollebeek
13:53 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Kaveh R. Ghazi
13:50 Re: New and exception Alexandre Oliva
13:19 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64 (phase 2): HP Linker problem Steve Ellcey
12:58 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Robert Dewar
12:54 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Kai Henningsen
12:54 Re: [parisc-linux] Problem building gcc-3.2 (cvs head) on hppa-linux Randolph Chung
12:21 Re: New and exception Tim Hollebeek
12:13 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64 (phase 2): HP Linker problem John David Anglin
12:12 Re: New and exception Alexandre Oliva
11:58 Re: New and exception H. J. Lu
11:54 Re: New and exception Alexandre Oliva
11:31 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Richard Henderson
11:23 Re: Gcj website Joseph S. Myers
11:06 Re: Gcj website Joe Buck
10:57 Re: Obsoleted Platform Joe Buck
10:53 Re: [parisc-linux] Problem building gcc-3.2 (cvs head) on hppa-linux John David Anglin
10:47 Re: [parisc-linux] Problem building gcc-3.2 (cvs head) on hppa-linux Randolph Chung
10:29 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
10:24 performance bug or known gcc-3.2 limit? Robert Schiele
09:52 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Richard Henderson
09:49 TR : (Problems) Building a standalone executable for ARM Gilles Delifer
09:37 New and exception H. J. Lu
09:34 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
09:32 Re: How to determine that 2.0 == (float) 2 in a front-end. Robert Dewar
09:03 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Kaveh R. Ghazi
07:40 c++ implies -fno-builtin -- why? Paul Koning
07:24 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Paul Koning
06:44 Re: [parisc-linux] Problem building gcc-3.2 (cvs head) on hppa-linux John David Anglin
05:07 Re: do { .... } while 0; Andreas Schwab
04:55 Re: do { .... } while 0; Naveen Sharma, Noida
04:52 compiler error: program cc1 got fatal signal 11 Peter S Groessinger
04:42 do { .... } while 0; Andrew Haley
04:35 do { .... } while 0; Erwin Ingris
04:27 Obsoleted Platform Alastair Boyanich
03:09 Re: Gcj website Gerald Pfeifer
02:22 Verifying Debug Info. Erwin Ingris
01:19 Programming with C Pointers Hong Feng
00:22 Problem building gcc-3.2 (cvs head) on hppa-linux Randolph Chung

July 11, 2002
23:50 Ordenadores de Ocasion Aliban Distribucion
23:31 Re: REG_CLASS_CONTENTS, >32 registers and 64-bit hosts Marek Michalkiewicz
21:55 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
21:46 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Hans-Peter Nilsson
21:44 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Roger Sayle
21:25 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Hans-Peter Nilsson
20:01 Deprecate default-argument-on-function-type extension? Mark Mitchell
14:48 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64 (phase 2): HP Linker problem Steve Ellcey
14:19 libstdc++.so.2.10.0 Katherine Gowan
14:06 Re: Lost patch - multiple entry points for x86 PIC Graham Stott
13:53 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64 (phase 2): HP Linker problem John David Anglin
13:43 Lost patch - multiple entry points for x86 PIC Zack Weinberg
13:31 Re: REG_CLASS_CONTENTS, >32 registers and 64-bit hosts Richard Henderson
13:25 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64 (phase 2): HP Linker problem Neil Booth
13:24 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Richard Henderson
13:16 Bootstrapping hppa64 (phase 2): HP Linker problem Steve Ellcey
12:25 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Denis Zaitsev
11:22 Good GCC build Chris Wilson
11:10 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Paul Koning
10:57 Re: bzero optimization rarely does Richard Henderson
10:54 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Richard Henderson
09:56 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem John David Anglin
09:46 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Steve Ellcey
08:33 gcc 3.1.x and std::basic_string< xxx >::replace( xxx ) link errors - please help Dylan Cuthbert
07:42 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem John David Anglin
06:44 Gcj website Andrew Haley
06:34 Gcj website nono
05:32 GCC Select Press 600 ... Angelika Altemark
03:51 RE: inerting nop's using the DFA scheduler Naveen Sharma, Noida
03:22 inerting nop's using the DFA scheduler Danish Samad
00:37 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Magnus Fromreide

July 10, 2002
23:56 Re: RFA: Alternate patch to avoid multiple zero vectos (Was: Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD) Richard Henderson
23:15 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Neil Booth
23:10 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Neil Booth
23:09 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Neil Booth
21:26 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem John David Anglin
21:14 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Zack Weinberg
19:58 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Jeff Law
17:02 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Steve Ellcey
16:22 Re: RFA: Alternate patch to avoid multiple zero vectos (Was: Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD) Joern Rennecke
16:20 Re: Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem John David Anglin
15:54 Bootstrapping hppa64? CPP problem Steve Ellcey
15:50 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Doug Evans
15:27 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Andrew Cagney
15:12 Re: Block scope using declarations of operators Gabriel Dos Reis
14:52 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Mark Mitchell
14:51 bzero optimization rarely does Paul Koning
14:47 Re: Block scope using declarations of operators Mark Mitchell
14:39 Re: REG_CLASS_CONTENTS, >32 registers and 64-bit hosts Marek Michalkiewicz
14:33 Re: default int paramters ignored? Gabriel Dos Reis
14:11 Re: default int paramters ignored? Joe Buck
14:06 [Patch] Add ia64 dispersal analysis capability to objdump, revised to include Itanium 2 Gary Hade
13:54 Re: RFA: Alternate patch to avoid multiple zero vectos (Was: Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD) Joern Rennecke
13:52 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Gabriel Dos Reis
13:50 Re: default int paramters ignored? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:48 Re: RFA: Alternate patch to avoid multiple zero vectos (Was: Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD) Jakub Jelinek
13:44 Re: RFA: Alternate patch to avoid multiple zero vectos (Was: Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD) Andrew Pinski
13:42 Re: default int paramters ignored? Andrew Pinski
13:41 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Joe Buck
13:40 RFA: Alternate patch to avoid multiple zero vectos (Was: Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD) Joern Rennecke
13:30 default int paramters ignored? Neal D. Becker
09:38 Re: Segfault with SSE builtins Ross Smith
09:16 Re: Segfault with SSE builtins Jan Hubicka
09:04 Re: gcc-2.95.3: EH and shared libs Richard Henderson
09:00 Re: REG_CLASS_CONTENTS, >32 registers and 64-bit hosts Richard Henderson
08:56 Segfault with SSE builtins Ross Smith
08:56 Re: Successful instalation Janis Johnson
08:54 Re: RFC: Java inliner Alexandre Oliva
08:44 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Richard Henderson
08:35 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Richard Henderson
07:58 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Earnshaw
07:56 Re: Block scope using declarations of operators Gabriel Dos Reis
07:33 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Henderson
07:33 Re: RFC: Java inliner Tom Tromey
07:32 Re: Block scope using declarations of operators Richard Smith
07:32 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Henderson
07:10 Re: Block scope using declarations of operators Gabriel Dos Reis
07:08 PR6631, it's CSE's fault Michael Matz
06:45 Block scope using declarations of operators Richard Smith
06:13 Re: typedef-named class member functions can be public Noel Yap
05:16 Re: typedef-named class member functions can be public Richard Kenner
05:08 Re: typedef-named class member functions can be public Richard Kenner
04:29 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
04:24 Re: RFC: Java inliner Alexandre Oliva
01:40 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley

July 09, 2002
23:46 [fm #18483] (broken-links) Broken links - Cygnus Java Compiler, Default branch Alexandre Oliva via RT
23:46 Re: [fm #18483] (broken-links) Broken links - Cygnus Java Compiler, Default branch Alexandre Oliva
22:13 Re: RFC: Java inliner Alexandre Oliva
19:38 Successful instalation Basilio B. Fraguela
18:09 Re: Default ix86_arch = i386 Greg Schafer
16:46 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Iain McClatchie
16:02 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Denis Zaitsev
13:16 Re: Understanding the default dynamic interpreter used by binutils/gcc.... Ian Lance Taylor
12:37 Understanding the default dynamic interpreter used by binutils/gcc.... Steven J. Hill
12:32 GCC reference via Doxygen Phil Edwards
11:23 Re: Cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? DJ Delorie
11:17 Re: Cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? Nathanael Nerode
11:16 dj on vacation July 13-28 DJ Delorie
11:06 Re: Cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? DJ Delorie
10:57 Cygwin not respecting --without-newlib? Nathanael Nerode
10:15 Re: gcc-3.1-Cygwin+Win98SE: Success Janis Johnson
10:12 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Earnshaw
09:35 Re: g++: a bug or a feature ??? mike stump
09:26 Bug with cerr,cout and flush in gcc 3.1 -- solid example. Thaddeus L. Olczyk
09:03 Re: Default ix86_arch = i386 Kelley Cook
08:44 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Henderson
08:43 Re: New bug - regression from 2.95.3 Paolo Carlini
08:42 Re: New bug - regression from 2.95.3 Paolo Carlini
08:37 New bug - regression from 2.95.3 Andreas Jaeger
08:11 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer David Edelsohn
08:06 Re: [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Richard Henderson
08:03 Re: How to get the line info about a function when outputing the funciton prolog? Alexandre Courbot
07:49 Re: g++: a bug or a feature ??? Andrew Pinski
07:34 g++: a bug or a feature ??? Yzhar Keysar
07:22 How to get the line info about a function when outputing the funciton prolog? Jiang Alan
05:07 [fm #18483] (broken-links) Broken links - Cygnus Java Compiler, Gerald Pfeifer via RT
05:07 Re: [fm #18483] (broken-links) Broken links - Cygnus Java Compiler,Default branch Gerald Pfeifer
04:58 [fm #18483] (broken-links) Broken links - Cygnus Java Compiler, Default branch Patrick Lenz via RT
04:10 Re: make does modify the source tree Andreas Schwab
03:49 make does modify the source tree Olaf Hering
03:13 Re: generation of divxu opcode Andrew Haley
02:38 gcc-2.95.3: EH and shared libs Kurt Garloff
02:06 Default ix86_arch = i386 Greg Schafer
01:49 Autovectorization Daniel Jungmann
01:10 Re: EH newbies howto Aldy Hernandez
00:36 Re: random users making high-priority PRs again Gerald Pfeifer
00:23 Re: generation of divxu opcode Kai Henningsen
00:23 Re: new build scheme on hold :-/ Kai Henningsen

July 08, 2002
21:23 Re: gcc-3.1-Cygwin+Win98SE: Success ERIC KRAUSE (ekraus02)
20:52 effect of -fmove-all-movables and -freduce-all-givs Laszlo Ladanyi
18:37 Re: EH newbies howto Aldy Hernandez
18:24 gcc-ss-20020708 is now available gccadmin
17:44 Re: new build scheme naming mike stump
16:57 Re: EH newbies howto Nix
15:41 gcc 3.1 lartey
15:24 Re: RFA: patch to avoid multiple zero vectors (Was: Re: zero vector usage) Aldy Hernandez
14:29 Re: edge types Jim Wilson
14:08 Re: new build scheme naming Nathan Sidwell
14:01 Re: EH newbies howto Aldy Hernandez
13:05 Re: EH newbies howto Mark Mitchell
13:03 Re: new build scheme naming Nathanael Nerode
13:02 Re: toplevel Makefile gcc questions Nathanael Nerode
13:01 Re: new build scheme naming DJ Delorie
12:57 Re: new build scheme naming Nathanael Nerode
12:55 Re: toplevel Makefile gcc questions DJ Delorie
12:50 Re: toplevel Makefile gcc questions Nathanael Nerode
11:27 REG_CLASS_CONTENTS, >32 registers and 64-bit hosts Marek Michalkiewicz
11:16 random users making high-priority PRs again Phil Edwards
11:00 [PATCH] __builtin_frame_address(0) doesn't work without the frame pointer Denis Zaitsev
10:48 Re: Successful Build 3.1 Janis Johnson
10:48 Re: Successful build/install Janis Johnson
10:47 Re: SUCCESS alpha-ev56 gcc-3.1 Janis Johnson
10:46 Re: Succesfull 3.1 Build on Cygwin 1.3.11-3 - XP Pro - c, c++, java Janis Johnson
10:46 Re: gcc 3.1-Cygwin+Win98SE: Success Janis Johnson
10:32 Re: zero vector usagee (Was: Re: RFA: gcc.dg/simd-1.c fix for x86) Aldy Hernandez
10:28 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Janis Johnson
10:25 Re: toplevel Makefile gcc questions DJ Delorie
10:24 Re: Machine Description File help mike stump
10:24 Re: Autoconfiscation Status DJ Delorie
10:23 Re: Autoconfiscation Status Ben Elliston
10:11 Writing function calls in RTL qubits
10:09 Re: Autoconfiscation Status Phil Edwards
10:09 Re: Autoconfiscation Status DJ Delorie
10:00 EH newbies howto Aldy Hernandez
09:02 Re: zero vector usagee (Was: Re: RFA: gcc.dg/simd-1.c fix for x86) Aldy Hernandez
08:31 Re: generation of divxu opcode Peter Barada
08:29 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Ben Woodhead
07:51 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Robert Lipe
06:43 Re: g++dg/dg.exp newbie usage problem Daniel Jacobowitz
06:28 RE: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Bernard Dautrevaux
05:44 Re: new build scheme naming DJ Delorie
05:30 Re: new build scheme on hold :-/ Nathanael Nerode
05:26 Re: new build scheme naming Nathanael Nerode
05:04 Re: PR 6255 Jason Merrill
04:39 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Joern Rennecke
04:07 Re: generation of divxu opcode Andrew Haley
03:42 zero vector usagee (Was: Re: RFA: gcc.dg/simd-1.c fix for x86) Joern Rennecke
03:12 Successful Build 3.1 Kathy Gerber
03:10 Machine Description File help yoshi ge
02:19 MIPS compile options (mad & double fp) Shane Nay
02:03 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gabriel Dos Reis
01:43 RE: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Bernard Dautrevaux
00:30 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Phil Edwards
00:03 Re: Comparing doubles Kai Henningsen
00:00 Re: Comparing doubles Lars Brinkhoff

July 07, 2002
23:53 Re: Write access to GNATS Gerald Pfeifer
23:14 Re: Spammed on posting a bug in GNATS Phil Edwards
22:27 PR 6255 Mark Mitchell
21:37 g++dg/dg.exp newbie usage problem dank
21:35 RE: generation of divxu opcode for H8300 Dhananjay R. Deshpande
19:26 Re: libstub, bsp, cygmon Mark Salter
19:10 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Mark Mitchell
18:06 Re: Comparing doubles Tim Hollebeek
16:25 Re: Comparing doubles Robert Dewar
15:45 Re: More space efficient virtual function calls Wink Saville
14:49 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Jamie Lokier
14:15 Re: new build scheme on hold :-/ Tom Tromey
13:47 Re: Comparing doubles Tim Hollebeek
13:31 Aspex Massively Parallel co-processor (content-addressable memory) Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
12:17 Re: More space efficient virtual function calls mike stump
11:56 Write access to GNATS Gabriel Dos Reis
11:52 Re: new build scheme naming mike stump
10:40 toplevel Makefile gcc questions Nathanael Nerode
10:11 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
10:03 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
09:20 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
09:17 new build scheme on hold :-/ Nathanael Nerode
09:09 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
08:45 Re: More space efficient virtual function calls Wink Saville
08:03 Re: More space efficient virtual function calls Matthew Wilcox
07:55 Re: Comparing doubles Robert Dewar
07:54 Re: Comparing doubles Robert Dewar
06:09 Re: Comparing doubles Paul Koning

July 06, 2002
17:29 More space efficient virtual function calls Wink Saville
16:40 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Joern Rennecke
16:23 Re: Spammed on posting a bug in GNATS Denis Zaitsev
16:09 Re: Spammed on posting a bug in GNATS Christopher Faylor
15:47 Re: Spammed on posting a bug in GNATS Denis Zaitsev
15:07 new build scheme naming Nathanael Nerode
15:02 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
15:02 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
14:39 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:48 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Joern Rennecke
13:38 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:34 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:28 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Gabriel Dos Reis
13:22 edge types Nathan Sidwell
13:10 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Joern Rennecke
13:00 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
13:00 Re: [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
12:15 Re: Results from Intel4s C++ ABI Testsuite Nathan Sidwell
11:56 Re: Remote testing cross-gcc dank
11:51 Re: Results from Intel´s C++ ABI Testsuite Graham Stott
11:44 Re: why hard_frame_pointer_rtx? Richard Henderson
11:33 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF mike stump
11:31 why hard_frame_pointer_rtx? Denis Zaitsev
11:10 / Denis Zaitsev
11:08 Results from Intel´s C++ ABI Testsuite Andreas Jaeger
11:04 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? David O'Brien
10:58 Re: Remote testing cross-gcc dank
10:35 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Aldy Hernandez
10:28 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gwenole Beauchesne
09:47 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Jeff Law
08:54 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Daniel Jacobowitz
07:53 Re: Comparing doubles Robert Dewar
07:49 Re: generation of divxu opcode Kai Henningsen
07:42 Re: Comparing doubles Robert Dewar
07:35 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
07:20 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:44 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
06:40 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
06:40 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
06:40 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
06:28 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gabriel Dos Reis
06:19 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gerald Pfeifer
05:40 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Jakub Jelinek
05:37 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gabriel Dos Reis
05:34 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:56 RE: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Scott Robert Ladd
04:48 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Daniel Egger
03:42 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Joseph S. Myers
03:32 Re: problem with cpp and C++ header in gcc 2.96 (RH 7.3) Colin Douglas Howell

July 05, 2002
22:35 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
22:18 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
16:35 RE: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Kean Johnston
16:16 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Mark Mitchell
16:12 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Jason Merrill
16:11 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? David Edelsohn
15:24 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Geoff Keating
15:23 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Stan Shebs
15:20 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Mark Mitchell
15:12 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? David Edelsohn
15:08 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Stan Shebs
15:02 Re: How can I initialize an array element in G++? Jason Merrill
15:02 Re: Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Jason Merrill
14:53 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? H. J. Lu
14:46 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? David O'Brien
14:42 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Mark Mitchell
14:40 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Mark Mitchell
14:35 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? H. J. Lu
14:33 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? David O'Brien
14:28 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? David O'Brien
14:28 Re: SIMPLE and fat pointers Diego Novillo
14:22 questions on builtin memcpy, memset Paul Koning
14:17 Re: Bug in flex prevents fixing ISO C warnings in gengtype-lex.c David O'Brien
14:03 Re: Bug in flex prevents fixing ISO C warnings in gengtype-lex.c David O'Brien
13:44 Autoconfiscation Status Nathanael Nerode
13:16 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Mark Mitchell
13:11 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
12:56 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Mark Mitchell
12:15 Request for Obsoletion: DWARF Mark Mitchell
12:13 How can I initialize an array element in G++? H. J. Lu
12:03 tree code output Stefan Frehse
10:13 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Aldy Hernandez
09:59 Re: Changing storage allocation for C Ranjit Singh
09:59 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Aldy Hernandez
09:55 gcc3.x Brian M. King
09:45 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... Mark Mitchell
08:01 Re: optimization/7145: [PATCH] g++ -O with structure initializer & return value optimization generates bad code H. J. Lu
08:00 Re: optimization/7145: [PATCH] g++ -O with structure initializer &return value optimization generates bad code Jason Merrill
05:55 RE: generation of divxu opcode Andrew Haley
05:48 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
05:19 RE: generation of divxu opcode Dhananjay R. Deshpande
04:12 Re: AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Aldy Hernandez

July 04, 2002
20:12 Re: gcc -O3 bug Zack Weinberg
19:12 gcc -O3 bug Zhou Jingtao
17:44 Successful build/install Scott Schappell
16:33 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... DJ Delorie
16:30 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... DJ Delorie
16:10 Re: mem ref!! Richard Henderson
15:59 Function declared extern "C" does not appear in getdecls() list Marcus Bartholomeu
15:22 AltiVec support toasted in HEAD Daniel Egger
14:51 SIMPLE and fat pointers Steven Bosscher
14:20 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... Geoff Keating
12:49 PR c/7102 Eric Botcazou
11:27 Re: generation of divxu opcode in h8300-hms Kazu Hirata
10:23 libstub, bsp, cygmon Nathanael Nerode
10:22 soldi legali !! soldi
10:19 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... Mark Mitchell
09:56 Re: My Build Scheme (was Re: Installation proposal) Nathanael Nerode
09:55 Re: C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? H. J. Lu
09:52 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... Nathanael Nerode
09:41 soldi legali !! soldi
09:36 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... DJ Delorie
09:35 C++ binary compatibility between GCC 3.1 and GCC 3.2? Andreas Jaeger
08:21 Re: Alignment =?UTF-8?B?QnJhbmtvIMSMaWJlag==
07:18 Alignment DI Christian Schmidleitner
06:54 Re: problem with cpp and C++ header in gcc 2.96 (RH 7.3) Andrew Pinski
06:52 problem with cpp and C++ header in gcc 2.96 (RH 7.3) Stefan Seefeld
05:11 Strange conversion behavior in g++ Martin Reinecke
04:54 Re: Changing storage allocation for C Erik Schnetter
04:22 RE: generation of divxu opcode in h8300-hms Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
04:18 FW: generation of divxu opcode in h8300-hms Andrew Haley
04:01 FW: generation of divxu opcode in h8300-hms Sanjiv Kumar Gupta, Noida
02:21 Re: forward declaration of `struct address_list' Debian User
02:08 Re: gcc 3.1 and -fnative-struct patch Douglas B Rupp
01:43 Re: How to set/pass GCJFLAGS? Andrew Haley
01:42 Re: shifting Nathan Sidwell
01:38 gcc 3.1 and -fnative-struct patch Paul Butcher
01:26 forward declaration of `struct address_list' sun zongjun
00:19 Re: configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... Mark Mitchell

July 03, 2002
23:42 Re: shifting Zack Weinberg
23:39 Re: shifting Michel LESPINASSE
23:25 shifting Marko Mlinar
21:28 Re: mem ref!! Erwin Ingris
17:24 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
17:05 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
17:05 Re: help on gcc mike stump
16:43 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
16:35 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
16:30 Re: Changing storage allocation for C Richard Henderson
16:25 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
16:16 Re: mem ref!! Richard Henderson
16:15 configure/make/make install with moving srcdir, builddir... Nathanael Nerode
16:03 Re: RFC: Use -Wa,-xgot for Linux/mips (Re: MIPS GOT overflow in gcc 3.2.) Ralf Baechle
15:45 please semi-disregard my previous messages Nathanael Nerode
15:43 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
15:41 My Build Scheme (was Re: Installation proposal) Nathanael Nerode
15:16 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
14:57 [BUG] valarray_copy, with mask_array, libstdc++-v3 Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton
14:42 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Mark Mitchell
14:39 Re: Get rid of libtool? [was Re: Makefile problems] Nathanael Nerode
14:14 Re: How to set/pass GCJFLAGS? Tom Tromey
13:46 Re: help please Toon Moene
13:46 Re: Bug in flex prevents fixing ISO C warnings in gengtype-lex.c Ben Elliston
13:29 help please Zhang Wang
13:26 PATCH: Fix canadian cross build for libjava (Re: Does canadian cross build work in libjava?) H. J. Lu
13:22 Re: How to set/pass GCJFLAGS? H. J. Lu
13:20 yay! Dave Aitel
13:15 Re: How to set/pass GCJFLAGS? Tom Tromey
13:13 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
12:15 Re: Howto special MIPS relocation? Eric Christopher
12:10 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Andrew J. Malton
11:37 How to set/pass GCJFLAGS? H. J. Lu
11:28 Howto special MIPS relocation? Francisco Rodriguez
11:14 Remove "/.libs" from shlib_search_path? H. J. Lu
10:53 Re: Bug in flex prevents fixing ISO C warnings in gengtype-lex.c Geoff Keating
10:45 Bug in flex prevents fixing ISO C warnings in gengtype-lex.c Kaveh R. Ghazi
10:39 Changing storage allocation for C Ranjit Singh
10:29 [tree-ssa-branch] Mainline merge as of 2002-06-30 Diego Novillo
10:27 C&B free cash daily newsletter cancel
10:00 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
09:50 Re: RFC: Use -Wa,-xgot for Linux/mips (Re: MIPS GOT overflow in gcc 3.2.) H. J. Lu
09:40 Re: RFC: Use -Wa,-xgot for Linux/mips (Re: MIPS GOT overflow in gcc 3.2.) Daniel Jacobowitz
09:35 RFC: Use -Wa,-xgot for Linux/mips (Re: MIPS GOT overflow in gcc 3.2.) H. J. Lu
09:25 Re: -Wtraditional and gcc 3.2 source code and new warning Kaveh R. Ghazi
09:22 Re: DFA scheduling for inline assembly. David S. Miller
09:14 help on gcc Mohit Singhal
08:55 DFA scheduling for inline assembly. Dan Towner
05:50 Re: PCH Andrew Pinski
05:10 sparc-sun-solaris2.8 && GCC-3.1 && bootstrap problem Jorgo Bakker
04:12 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Ian Dall
03:50 mem ref!! Erwin Ingris
03:33 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Richard Earnshaw
02:32 "make install" failure with gcc 3.1.1 branch Uros Bizjak
02:08 Re: Reload problem on ppc64 (was: Analysis of high priority PRc/2454) Michael Matz
02:06 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
02:00 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Michael Matz
01:37 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
01:34 PCH Raingeard David
00:32 Does canadian cross build work in libjava? H. J. Lu

July 02, 2002
23:20 Re: How is aclocal.m4 in gcc maintained? H. J. Lu
22:34 3.2 bootstrap failure building cc1plus on sparcv9-sun-solaris2.8 Brad Lucier
21:51 Re: How is aclocal.m4 in gcc maintained? Nathanael Nerode
21:37 Re: How is aclocal.m4 in gcc maintained? H. J. Lu
21:28 Re: How is aclocal.m4 in gcc maintained? Nathanael Nerode
21:18 PATCH: Fix aclocal.md in fastjar and libffi (Re: How is aclocal.m4 in gcc maintained?) H. J. Lu
20:37 How is aclocal.m4 in gcc maintained? H. J. Lu
20:18 -Wtraditional and gcc 3.2 source code and new warning Andrew Pinski
19:45 Re: don't build send-pr,prms,gnats.tar Nathanael Nerode
18:25 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Jim Wilson
18:16 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Jim Wilson
16:54 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
16:46 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Richard Henderson
14:37 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported DJ Delorie
13:46 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported Gerald Pfeifer
13:43 Re: v850 branch status Geoff Keating
13:34 Re: v850 branch status Geoff Keating
13:33 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make Raja R Harinath
13:33 Re: High priority bugs Mark Mitchell
13:14 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make H. J. Lu
13:05 Re: builtin_args_info and darwin Richard Henderson
13:04 Re: builtin_args_info and darwin Richard Henderson
12:58 Re: "./contrib/gcc_update --touch" doesn't work with make Gerald Pfeifer
12:56 Re: High priority bugs Gerald Pfeifer
12:31 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Daniel Berlin
12:25 Re: gcc 3.1 installation Gary Smith
12:16 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Jeff Law
12:11 Re: schedule-ebbs and trapping insns Richard Henderson
11:56 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Richard Henderson
11:48 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Alex Rosenberg
11:48 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Joe Buck
11:40 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Kumar Gala
11:34 Re: GCC 3.2 20020701 C++ new failures on AIX Mark Mitchell
11:27 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Jeff Law
11:16 High priority bugs Reichelt
11:03 Re: Reload problem on ppc64 (was: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454) Geoff Keating
10:53 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Alex Rosenberg
10:47 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Roger Sayle
10:42 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. David Edelsohn
10:39 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Matt Thomas
10:32 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Aldy Hernandez
10:31 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Aldy Hernandez
09:59 Re: Reload problem on ppc64 (was: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454) David Edelsohn
09:59 Fwd: GCC build failed for 3 targets with your patch on 2002-07-02T16:25:08Z. Andrew Pinski
09:59 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Alex Rosenberg
09:50 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Joe Buck
08:45 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Kumar Gala
08:26 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Jeff Law
07:48 Re: GCC 3.2 20020701 C++ new failures on AIX Nathan Sidwell
07:46 Re: Comparing doubles Lars Brinkhoff
07:44 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Aldy Hernandez
07:36 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Kumar Gala
07:34 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Aldy Hernandez
07:29 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Kumar Gala
03:59 tree to source-code rost
03:20 Re: PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Paolo Carlini
02:41 3.2: i386: Optimizing Conditional operator expressions rbrown64
01:58 Reload problem on ppc64 (was: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454) Michael Matz
00:42 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Matt Thomas

July 01, 2002
23:49 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Kumar Gala
23:24 Re: Comparing doubles Lars Brinkhoff
23:10 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Roger Sayle
19:54 Re: gcc 3.1 installation Jeff Sturm
19:34 gcc-ss-20020701 is now available gccadmin
16:10 PATCH: -fomit-frame-pointer and exceptions or setjmp/longjmp Denis Zaitsev
15:55 Re: more toplevel targets I'd like to slay... please comment. Stan Shebs
15:49 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Alex Rosenberg
15:48 more toplevel targets I'd like to slay... please comment. Nathanael Nerode
14:57 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Matt Thomas
14:39 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Joern Rennecke
14:35 Re: GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Geoff Keating
14:32 Re: gcc 3.1 installation Gary Smith
14:27 GCC/powerpc AltiVec expectations. Matt Thomas
14:11 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Aldy Hernandez
13:59 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Nathanael Nerode
13:51 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Jeff Law
13:51 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Joern Rennecke
13:38 builtin_args_info and darwin Aldy Hernandez
13:37 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status DJ Delorie
13:31 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Aldy Hernandez
13:22 Re: simd-2.c failing on powerpc-linux Joern Rennecke
12:45 Re: prototypes for functions with no arguments Neil Booth
12:44 nuova chat mutitasking jusy
12:43 nuova chat mutitasking jusy
12:18 Re: Comparing doubles Alan Lehotsky
12:13 Re: Comparing doubles Tim Hollebeek
12:00 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Richard Kenner
11:58 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
11:56 Re: RFC: Java inliner Daniel Berlin
11:55 Re: Comparing doubles Geoff Keating
11:53 prototypes for functions with no arguments Matt Kraai
11:29 Java inliner Andrew Haley
11:21 Re: RFC: Java inliner Andrew Haley
11:16 Comparing doubles Lars Brinkhoff
11:06 Re: optimization/7145: g++ -O with structure initializer & return value optimization generates bad code H. J. Lu
10:52 Re: objdir == srcdir is completely unsupported DJ Delorie
10:29 Re: schedule-ebbs and trapping insns Jeff Law
10:22 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Jeff Law
10:18 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Jeff Law
10:08 Re: Re: help! Eric Botcazou
09:51 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Roger Sayle
09:21 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Andrew Cagney
09:19 Re: Test suite for new front end: DejaGNU or QMtest Mark Mitchell
09:14 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Nathanael Nerode
09:00 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Jeff Law
08:29 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Richard Kenner
08:02 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Nathanael Nerode
07:42 Re: Analysis of high priority PR c/2454 Roger Sayle
07:42 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Ben Elliston
07:10 Linux newbee Kent Gallinger
06:49 Re: builtin_return_addr vs frame_pointer_needed vs -O3 Ian Dall
06:37 RE: Re: help! tony_hcb
03:41 Re: Top Level Autoconfiscation Status Andrea 'Fyre Wyzard' Bocci
03:05 Re: rfc: macros accepting constructors Marc Espie
01:54 Re: GCC 3.1.1 Status Gerald Pfeifer

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.5.8