This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion

From: "David O'Brien" <obrien at NUXI dot com>
To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caip dot rutgers dot edu>
Cc: aldyh at redhat dot com, jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, shebs at apple dot com
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2002 18:25:23 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
Organization: The NUXI BSD group
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206140200500.15803-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk> <m23cvqjwz1.fsf@culebra.cygnus.com> <200206141414.KAA00820@caip.rutgers.edu>
Reply-to: obrien at NUXI dot com

On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 10:14:22AM -0400, Kaveh R. Ghazi wrote:
>  > From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh@redhat.com>
>  > 
>  > >>>>> "Joseph" == Joseph S Myers <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
>  > 
>  >  > Does this require traditional C for target files in gcc/config/
>  >  > for targets that are only used for cross-compilation, or which
>  >  > don't have any non-ISO bootstrap compiler?
> 
> We're not converting config/* yet.

Why?  I would really like to use string concatenation in freebsd.h files.
Why hold my OS back for HP braindeadness?
 
-- 
-- David    (obrien@NUXI.com)

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Stan Shebs
- Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

References:
- Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Joseph S. Myers
- Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
  - From: Kaveh R. Ghazi

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]