Re: autoconfiscation status notification

[Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>]

Nathanael Nerode <neroden@doctormoo.dyndns.org> writes:

> This is just a notification that I have what I think is a working top
> level autoconfiscation.  I'm currently bootstrapping and it's finished
> stage1 successfully.  After I finish the bootstrap, I have two more
> native bootstrap scenarios to test (ubertree and build-in-place), and
> then four non-native combinations, and finally the 'dist'-type targets 
> for gdb & binutils, so it will be a while before I actually sumbit the
> patch.
>
> But I really think this one's going to work. :-)
>
> One nice thing -- 'make' is already somewhat faster than it used to be,
> so the testing shouldn't take as long as I originally anticipated.
>
> I would, however, like to know if there are any particular targets which
> I should test to make sure 'multilibs' work properly, since I'm not big
> on the understanding of multilibs.  
>
> It would also be nice if someone could suggest particular
> cross-compilation targets which generally work 'out of the box', so I

Just check the gcc-testresults list for what has recently send in.
I'll do weekly runs and report successes.  powerpc-eabism should
definitly work since it's tested daily by Geoff's regression tester.

Andreas

> don't have to spend my time working around bugs which my changes neither
> create nor destroy.
>
> --Nathanael
>

-- 
 Andreas Jaeger
  SuSE Labs aj@suse.de
   private aj@arthur.inka.de
    http://www.suse.de/~aj