This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question
- From: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777 at yahoo dot com>
- To: Paul Koning <pkoning at equallogic dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 17:09:14 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: Meta-Level Compilation project / Introspector/ AST access / Licensing question
> I seem to remember this same discussion a month or
> two ago. It didn't
> lead anywhere then either, and it has nothing to do
> with the topic of
> this list.
Really? The interfaces of the gcc is not a topic?
This is going towards the opening up of the interfaces
of the gcc, that is very important.
This list is for the further development of the gcc,
I have been working on it as well and have a right to
raise my issues and have them resolved.
I am not going away untill they are.
>It would be nice if it could just stop,
> or move to
> wherever it does belong.
I have discussed it elsewhere, I am bringing back the
conclusions and the idea gained outside.
Yes, this discussion is going for a long time.
All I want is a clear statement on my project so I can
continue:
Something like :
1. XML and SQL is ok.
2. Embedding a language is OK.
3. XML and SQL is not OK, embedding a language is not
OK, but only if stanford does it!
4. Making a perl module is ok.
5. SQL is not ok, but GDBM is ok?
Come on guys, get real!
when can we have a bit of fairness here?
mike
=====
James Michael DuPont
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com