This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
Cc: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>,"gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 23:06:41 +0100
Subject: Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
References: <wvlsn3l6g8o.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><1024331091.1209.44.camel@shadowfax><wvln0tt686d.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20020617200712.GB17672@tornado.toronto.redhat.com><wvlbsa964m2.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20020617203200.GC17672@tornado.toronto.redhat.com>

>>>>> "Diego" == Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> writes:

> The McCAT folks already went through these pains when they
> designed Jimple, the Java version of SIMPLE
> (http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/soot/doc/soot/jimple/package-summary.html)

IMO Jimple is not a very good guide for us, since it is targeted at
compiling Java bytecode, and the particular challenges that entails.  It
makes no attempt to retain structure, since that has already been thrown
away by the time we get to bytecode.

Jason

References:
- [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] simplifying C++
  - From: Diego Novillo

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]