This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
- From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at codesourcery dot com>
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: 14 Jun 2002 08:29:01 +0200
- Subject: Re: GCC Steering Committee decision on ISO C conversion
- Organization: CodeSourcery, LLC
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0206140159090.15803-100000@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk>
"Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28@cam.ac.uk> writes:
| On 13 Jun 2002, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
|
| > I know GCC/gcc insists on saying ISO C89, but that is incorrect and
| > I'll submit a patch to correct that anachronism.
|
| So, you disagree with Phil's reasoning in
| http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2000-08/msg00132.html
Yes, I disagree with that reasoning: There were an ANSI C89 but no ISO C89.
| (the only response I got about choice of name in diagnostics that gave a
| preference between the two)?
Sorry, I missed that thread.
There seems to be some confusion. I'm not sure it is a good thing to
keep it on.
There is an interesting summary in
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb/2002-06/msg00026.html
and associated followups.
-- Gaby