This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: 12 Jun 2002 12:28:31 -0400
Subject: Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure
References: <20020611194129.GA26118@tornado.toronto.redhat.com><wvlofehgwn5.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><20020612013813.GA27772@tornado.toronto.redhat.com> <wvln0u0fpt7.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com>

On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 12:02, Jason Merrill wrote:

> + #if 0
> + static void simplify_expr_either     PARAMS ((tree *, tree *, tree *,
> +                                               int (*) PARAMS ((tree)), tree));
>
I thought we were going to get rid of these?

> + 
> +   VARRAY_FREE (dim_stack);
> + #endif
>
varrays are garbage collected now.  You'll likely hit a segmentation
violation when you enable this.


Diego.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.cfailure
  - From: Jason Merrill

References:
- [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure
  - From: Diego Novillo
- PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.c failure
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: PATCH Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] gcc.dg/struct-alias-1.cfailure
  - From: Jason Merrill

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]