This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: New cpp0 warning in 3.1 breaks configure (autoconf)


Neil Booth <neil@daikokuya.demon.co.uk> writes:

> Since this appears to be causing pain to many people, and no-one seems
> to be willing to defend the warning when people ask about it on the
> mailing lists, I suggest this is the best course of action for the
> mainline source too.

Is there any way to warn about /usr/include without warning about
/usr/local/include?  Packages that add -I/usr/include are buggy and the
maintainers need to fix them, whether they realize that or are willing to
face it or not.  I have no sympathy there.  But -I/usr/local/include is
less obviously wrong.

-- 
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu)             <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]