This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: jh at suse dot cz
Cc: law at redhat dot com, dann at godzilla dot ICS dot UCI dot EDU, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, vmakarov at redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2002 04:32:05 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed
References: <200206051353.aa01413@gremlin-relay.ics.uci.edu><5138.1023311182@porcupine.cygnus.com><20020606113337.GC9943@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

   From: Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
   Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2002 13:33:37 +0200
   
   Would be possible to know the full -fno-inline comparisons?

That was posted, they were about the same.
So the inlining heuristic theory appears quite strong.

References:
- Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed
  - From: Dan Nicolaescu
- Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed
  - From: law
- Re: 3.2 vs 3.1 speed
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]