This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8

From: "David S. Miller" <davem at redhat dot com>
To: pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at
Cc: java at gcc dot gnu dot org, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 14:54:33 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
References: <20020604.142114.45742355.davem@redhat.com><Pine.BSF.4.44.0206042352150.74598-100000@pulcherrima.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>

   From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
   Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 23:53:10 +0200 (CEST)

   On Tue, 4 Jun 2002, David S. Miller wrote:
   >> Seen on a sparc-sun-solaris2.8 box with 512MB of main memory and 1GB swap,
   >> that is, 1.5GB of virtual memory, using Solaris native ld.
   > Strange, works for me with 128MB of ram and no swap under Linux/SPARC
   > with GNU ld.
   
   Could it be that the GNU tools (ld,...) simply are that much better
   than Sun's?

I'm skeptical that it's as wide a gap as 1.5GB vs. 128MB.

Follow-Ups:
- PATCH: Use libgcj_convenience.la ( Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8)
  - From: H . J . Lu

References:
- Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
  - From: David S. Miller
- Re: libjava bootstrap failure on sparc-sun-solaris2.8
  - From: Gerald Pfeifer

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]