This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive
- From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
- To: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
- Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2002 15:34:36 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: [ast-optimizer-branch] Simplification is pretty expensive
On 4 Jun 2002, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On Tue, 2002-06-04 at 13:22, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > I tought it just enabled the simplification pass?
> >
> Yes, but simplification was not really enabled until we fixed the
> bootstrap problems.
It's not surprising that it causes worse scores.
Fer instance, the for loop screw up alone could account for worse scores .
In case you've forgotten, remember I pointed out that it seems to, exactly
when it can't matter except to be pointless, shares the for init header with the for expr, so
that you end up with
say
for (t.3 = a + 5; q < 40 ; t.3 = a + 5)
--Dan