This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: libstdc++ configure foobar ?
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 09:32:35PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:35:57AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:27:10PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:22:42AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:54:24PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > > > I've been trying to commit needed configure/configure.in changes to
> > > > > libstdc++, but I can't.
> > > > >
> > > > > The configure and configure.in files in libstdc++ are out of synch,
> > > > > both in HEAD and in the 3.1 branch.
> > >
> > > > Why do you patch configure? It is a generated file.
>
> > > That's precisely what I'm saying.
> > > I've tried regenerating it before changing configure.in, and the result
> > > doesn't match.
>
> > If you don't use the identical autconf the last person used, they will
> > never be the same.
>
> Okay, what I've been saying is that, if you look at configure.in and
> configure history, they've *NOT BEEN COMMITTED AT THE SAME TIME* the
> last few times.
Just checking but - are you sure about this? The diff you posted looks
reminiscent of two of the many versions of autoconf 2.13 floating
around.
> And I've been using official autoconf to check this. There would be
> a difference in the preamble if I were using a distinct autoconf.
Not necessarily. Only if you were using one with a distinct version
number.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer