This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ configure foobar ?


On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:35:57AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 05:27:10PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 08:22:42AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:54:24PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> > > > I've been trying to commit needed configure/configure.in changes to
> > > > libstdc++, but I can't.
> > > > 
> > > > The configure and configure.in files in libstdc++ are out of synch,
> > > > both in HEAD and in the 3.1 branch.
> > 
> > > Why do you patch configure? It is a generated file.

> > That's precisely what I'm saying.
> > I've tried regenerating it before changing configure.in, and the result 
> > doesn't match.

> If you don't use the identical autconf the last person used, they will
> never be the same.

Okay, what I've been saying is that, if you look at configure.in and
configure history, they've *NOT BEEN COMMITTED AT THE SAME TIME* the
last few times.

And I've been using official autoconf to check this. There would be
a difference in the preamble if I were using a distinct autoconf.

It seems that you are thinking I don't know at all what I am doing.
Please revise your judgement, and really look at the problem, or don't
bother answering.

Thanks.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]