This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1

From: Tony Finch <dot at dotat dot at>
To: Fergus Henderson <fjh at cs dot mu dot OZ dot AU>
Cc: Tony Finch <dot at dotat dot at>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 16:11:56 +0100
Subject: Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
References: <20020530105835.F10098@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20020530212917.A9009@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <87ofexet5s.fsf@fadata.bg> <20020530234630.A9357@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <20020530145137.D621@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20020531000106.B9357@hg.cs.mu.oz.au> <20020530150701.A748@chiark.greenend.org.uk> <20020531002819.A10604@hg.cs.mu.oz.au>

On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 12:28:19AM +1000, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> 
> What about it?  I don't see how it is relevant.
> Maybe you meant some other section?

Oops, maybe the text version of N869 isn't as useful as I thought :-(
(Hmm, that means you can declare variables of a structure type containing
a flexible array member.)

Tony (goes back to using xpdf).
-- 
f.a.n.finch <dot@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/
NORTH FITZROY: VARIABLE 3 OR 4, BECOMING SOUTHERLY 5 OR 6 IN FAR NORTHWEST.
FAIR. GOOD.

References:
- C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Tony Finch
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Momchil Velikov
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Tony Finch
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Fergus Henderson
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Tony Finch
- Re: C99 conformance bug in gcc-3.1
  - From: Fergus Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]