This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: New port (ip2k)
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Denis Chertykov <denisc at overta dot ru>
- Cc: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Pavel Baranov <pavel dot baranov at ubicom dot com>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 14:34:41 -0600
- Subject: Re: New port (ip2k)
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Denis Chertykov writes:
> email@example.com writes:
> > In message <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Denis Chertykov writes:
> > > > Also note the work may be original based on work Red Hat did for Ubic
> om --
> > >
> > > > if that is the case, then the underlying work would be covered by Red
> > > > blanket copyright assignment.
> > >
> > > What must we have to commit port ? (Which disclaimers and assignments)
> > No additional assignments from Red Hat are needed -- again, this work is
> > covered by Red Hat's blanket assignment to the FSF.
> So, Can I send port for approval right now ?
As long as your assignment and a disclaimer from Ubicom for your work is on
file with the FSF.
> Technical question:
> ip2k port have a macro LIMIT_BASE_REG_CLASS which used two times in reload.c
> Just a two call. Can it be approved ?
> I can describe a problem more detailed if required.
We'd have to have more details.