This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Can the gcc 3.x code be cleaned up to avoid unnecessary warning m essages?
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: "Hughes, Martin" <Martin dot Hughes at uk dot thalesgroup dot com>
- Cc: "'gcc at gnu dot org'" <gcc at gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 19:15:32 +0100
- Subject: Re: Can the gcc 3.x code be cleaned up to avoid unnecessary warning m essages?
- References: <C02943801230D611919D00508BDF0C2496C6D5@rtwexch.int.rdel.co.uk>
Hughes, Martin wrote:-
> Native target is hppa1.0-hp-hpux10. O/S is HP-UX 10.20.
> In many modules the compiler throws up warnings about the following:
> unused variables
> comparison between signed and unsigned operands
These are hard; patches welcome if you can justify why your chosen
cast is correct.
> operands being signed in ANSI C and unsigned in traditional.
These are unavoidable.