This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc-3.1 bootstrap (all languages) successful with -O3 -funroll-loops

On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 12:17:22PM +0200, Arto Nirkko wrote:
> gcc-3.1 bootstrap (all languages) successful with -O3 -funroll-loops
> # output of config.guess:
> sparc-sun-solaris2.6
> # output gcc -v:
> Reading specs from /usr/local/links/bin/../lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/3.1/specs
> Configured with: ../gcc-3.1-static-bimbo2.6/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc/gcc-3.1 --disable-shared --with-gnu-as --with-as=/usr/local/bin/as --with-gnu-ld --with-ld=/usr/local/bin/ld --enable-threads --with-cpu=supersparc --enable-cpp --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs --disable-nls
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.1
> # languages
> all (full distribution)
> # sytem info
> Solaris 2.6 (with recent patches) on Sun Ultra-1;
> the produced binary installation is also successfully used
> on Sparcstation-4 (Solaris 2.6), which is why -msupersparc was used,
> and also to be used on Ultra-10 (Solaris 2.7/8)
> # other info
> in contrast to earlier versions (including gcc-3.0.4), everything
> and all languages built fine even using non-standard options
> for the bootstrap:
>     -fPIC -O3 -funroll-loops -msupersparc -Qn -Wa,-Qn -s

Thanks!  Your message is linked from the GCC 3.1 build status list at

> However, the testsuite results (submitted using the script)
> deviate slightly from the ones reported for Solaris2.6
> (presumably bootstrapped with more standard options).

Your test results are linked from the same entry.

> ***** Why do the compiler flags used for the bootstrap *****
> ***** do not get reported with gcc -v, and are also    *****
> ***** not required for reporting?                      *****
> (it seems to make a difference, even regarding to the success
> of the bootstrap, resp. of the stage2/3 comparison, which failed
> with gcc-3.0.4 with the above flags...)

For reports of successful bootstraps we ask for additional relevant
information that's not on the list.  The assumption is that people
used the default bootsflags.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]