This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?
- From: Matthias Benkmann <matthias at winterdrache dot de>
- To: gcc at gnu dot org
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 20:17:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: Is this a bug for gcc (2.95 and 3.1)?
On Mon, 27 May 2002 19:16:49 +0200 Bernard Dautrevaux
> declared and defined B::~B, so B seems NOT to be abstract...
> If I'm right above this does not apply, and so GCC-3.1 is in error.
I've posted this question on comp.std.c++ and so far 2 people have replied
and they agree with you. The program is valid and if GCC-3.1 doesn't chew
it, it's a bug.
Bad comments reveal the bad programmer.