This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: the floating point carnage
On Sun, May 26, 2002 at 02:07:14PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> What about Stephen's concern that the changes were made without a
> plan for FP correctness? The work had a plan for simplification and
> consistency in the compiler, which is very helpful. Where was volunteer
> expertise in compiler FP numerical analysis taken into account?
I was going in with the assumption that the existing FP emulator was
correct, and the work was geared such that nothing would get any
Roman's work in progress needs more attention to these details - I'll
start by wiring it up to Paranoia when he gets done.