This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...

From: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
To: Matthijs van Duin <matthijs at cds dot nl>
Cc: Craig Newell <craign at ieee dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 14:33:01 -0700
Subject: Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0205232133390.2196-100000@localhost.localdomain> <v04220806b913bfb5585a@[194.134.44.75]>

On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 12:00:34PM +0200, Matthijs van Duin wrote:
> the solution was to make the variables "volatile register"

There is no such thing.  You got "volatile" without "register".


r~

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Matthijs van Duin
- Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Matthijs van Duin

References:
- RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Craig Newell
- Re: RegRegname vs. Explicit Local Register Variables ...
  - From: Matthijs van Duin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]