This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
- From: John Jones <john at algor dot co dot uk>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 15:42:01 +0100
- Subject: Re: QMTest and the G++ testsuite
- References: <email@example.com>
ok point taken, well put
(-; there's always one of those
I think you will find
Algorithmics,The Fruit Farm,Ely Road,CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND
P: +44 1223 706200 F: +44 1223 706250 W: http://www.algor.co.uk
Mark Mitchell wrote:
> --On Monday, May 20, 2002 01:43:00 PM +0100 John Jones
> <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Dear Mark Mitchell
>> will it integrate with Bugzilla ?
>> this would be a major feature (in my book anyway).
> Remember where I said:
>>> Let's try to keep the discussion focused on how to get results with
>>> QMTest that are at least as good as we get with DejaGNU. If we use
>>> this as a forum for talking about everyone's personal viewpoint on
>>> testing on general and "I've always really wanted to see X ability",
>>> we're going to get too distracted.
> DejaGNU doesn't integrate with Bugzilla, so this isn't really a
> head-to-head comparison issue.
> The original plan was for QMTest to integrate with QMTrack -- but then
> the funding for QMTrack went away. It would be really nice to have an
> integrated bug-tracking and testing system; I agree. It would be
> possible to integrate QMTest with Bugzilla, but it isn't integrated