This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc compile-time performance
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: dewar at gnat dot com, gdr at codesourcery dot com
- Cc: davem at redhat dot com, drow at mvista dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org,law at redhat dot com, mark at codesourcery dot com, scott at coyotegulch dot com
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 08:39:19 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: gcc compile-time performance
> Maybe, maybe not. However, I do know that GCC-2.95 took much less
> than GCC-3.1 (not counting Java) to bootstrap.
Yes, sure, but that's the other conversation. What I was commenting on
was SPARC vs Redhat Linux, which is a different issue entirely from
2.95 vs 3.1. We know that the bootstrap of 3.1 will take longer and
this has been discussed at length elsewhere, so let's not confuse
The bottom line here seems to be that Java and make check are the real