This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc compile-time performance


Robert Dewar wrote:-

> I disagree, unless you have some perverse definiteion of "properly".

Well, a call to the mb functions or iconv is considerably more
expensive than

   c = *buffer->cur++;

I'm not sure, but if we want caret-positioned diagnostics in future
(I certainly do) then it may require more book-keeping for that too.

Why do you think multibyte char support is cheap?

Neil.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]