This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc compile-time performance
- From: Neil Booth <neil at daikokuya dot demon dot co dot uk>
- To: Robert Dewar <dewar at gnat dot com>
- Cc: aoliva at redhat dot com, chip dot cuntz at earthling dot net, davem at redhat dot com,gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, jh at suse dot cz
- Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 12:39:46 +0100
- Subject: Re: gcc compile-time performance
- References: <20020519111849.D908FF28CC@nile.gnat.com>
Robert Dewar wrote:-
> I disagree, unless you have some perverse definiteion of "properly".
Well, a call to the mb functions or iconv is considerably more
c = *buffer->cur++;
I'm not sure, but if we want caret-positioned diagnostics in future
(I certainly do) then it may require more book-keeping for that too.
Why do you think multibyte char support is cheap?