Re: gcc compile-time performance

[Michael Hayes <m dot hayes at elec dot canterbury dot ac dot nz>]

David Edelsohn writes:
 > 	Which is one of the patches that Daniel Berlin submitted but was
 > rejected based on the opinion that we wanted fewer, not more, bit set
 > implementations.

I think the problem was that we had too many bitset _interfaces_.
This is what prompted me to write an abstract data type that supported
multiple bitset implementations, including Dan's "efficient" bitset
implementation.

Michael.