This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc compile-time performance


> Many of the "proprietary compilers" will shame GCC under the table for
> compilation times.  If you're knocking down a gig or more of source,
> that absolutely does matter.

Well in the case of Ada, GNAT compares reasonably favorably with other
proprietary Ada compilers in compilation speed, and very favorably in
terms of generated code, though there are exceptions to the latter. 
The front end of GNAT is very fast, so usually by far the larger part
of the time is spent in the backend. How does this compare with the C++ case?


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]