This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3


On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 07:00:16PM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Another idea, is it possible for you to eassilly compare this on non-i386
> architecture?  The i386 backend has been redesigned and the memory overhead is
> now unfortunately considerably bigger, so getting 2.95 scores is dificult in
> this area.  i386 is not dead architecture and in 4 years since 2.95 the CPUs
> got significantly faster, so it may compensate the regression.

I don't believe memory is an issue there. The machine I've run these tests
on has 1GB of memory.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]