This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: gcc 3.1 is still very slow, compared to 2.95.3


On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Marc Espie wrote:
> 
> 
> Okay, now, what passes is gcc 3.1 running that slow it down that much ?
> What would be the equivalent set of options to gcc's 2.95.3 -O2, so that
> I can see whether we can get down to more reasonable numbers ?

I don't think it's practical to determine that list.  Too many things
are conditional only on if (optimize) or if (optimize > 1)...

Your best bet is probably to add -Q to CFLAGS, record all the output,
and write a script to mangle it into a coherent report.

Also, could you try comparisons at -O1?  Fewer optimization passes
have been added to that level.

zw


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]