This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 3.1 Branch

From: Aldy Hernandez <aldyh at redhat dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 17 May 2002 15:31:14 +1000
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
References: <152250000.1021510337@gandalf.codesourcery.com> <m2y9ej8rkr.fsf@culebra.cygnus.com> <20020517041237.GA19740@nevyn.them.org>

On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 12:12:37AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 11:56:52AM +1000, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > >>>>> "Mark" == Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> writes:
> > 
> >  >    c) they add support for new platforms, language features, etc.
> >  >       that we did not support before -- and that we cannot, therefore,
> >  >       be regressing.
> > 
> > Great.  I'd like permission to check in my cleanups to the user level
> > include file: <altivec.h>
> > 
> > There are some major fixes without which, altivec support isn't going
> > to be very useful.
> 
> Are you considering backporting the more important backend changes,
> also?  I don't know how practical it is, but lots of people would
> appreciate it.

hmm, i'm afraid mark said no.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell

References:
- GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: Aldy Hernandez
- Re: GCC 3.1 Branch
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]