This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 3.1 produces a larger 2.5.15 Linux kernel than 3.0.4
- From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot com>
- To: walken at zoy dot org (Michel LESPINASSE)
- Cc: jakub at redhat dot com (Jakub Jelinek),Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM (Joe Buck),alessandro dot suardi at oracle dot com (Alessandro Suardi), gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 16:44:00 -0700 (PDT)
- Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 produces a larger 2.5.15 Linux kernel than 3.0.4
On Fri, May 17, 2002 at 12:42:58AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > A patch to bump this limit for functions declared inline explicitely (at
> > least for C) would be very helpful though (I think Kurt Garloff had one
> > in his patchset).
> I actually think that (for C, when using inline explicitly) the limit
> should be infinite.
So if someone writes a recursive inline function, we can really test
if "infinite" means "infinite". :-)
Well, at any rate, the inline limit should be substantially higher for
functions explicitly marked inline.