This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCSE store motion
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: Toon Moene <toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl>
- Cc: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:52:15 -0600
- Subject: Re: GCSE store motion
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <3CE2BCB4.D6D36685@moene.indiv.nluug.nl>, Toon Moene writes:
> No, but it'll help any and all Fortran programs that have to be compiled
> with -fno-automatic because they were developed on systems where local
> variables in subroutines kept their values from call to call.
> Given the number of times my advice on comp.lang.fortran of compiling
> with -fno-automatic actually `stopped the bug', I'd think that's rather
> important ...
So this means there may be another way to test/benchmark this code -- using
the Fortran tests from spec with -fno-automatic.