This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
- From: Phil Edwards <phil at jaj dot com>
- To: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer at dbai dot tuwien dot ac dot at>
- Cc: Stan Shebs <shebs at apple dot com>, Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>, Maurizio Loreti <loreti at pd dot infn dot it>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Paolo Carlini <pcarlini at unitus dot it>
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 15:17:51 -0400
- Subject: Re: Error report (gcc 3.1)
- References: <3CE3D201.C8A121AF@apple.com> <Pine.BSF.firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Thu, May 16, 2002 at 09:14:59PM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Thu, 16 May 2002, Stan Shebs wrote:
> > Yes. We've been hosed by this too, and it's so confusing it should
> > probably in some sort of FAQ or release note. The problem is that the
> > old basic_file.h is always going to be in the search path ahead of the
> > new one, and so any installation that doesn't completely delete the
> > pre-3.1-final g++-v3 is going to get nailed by this.
> I believe we'd be better of recommending against installing one version
> of GCC over another one.
We do this already on http://gcc.gnu.org/install/ but repetition can't hurt.
I'll add a note to the libstdc++-v3 FAQ.
If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater
than the animating contest for freedom, go home and leave us in peace. We seek
not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you;
and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen. - Samuel Adams