This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
- From: dewar at gnat dot com (Robert Dewar)
- To: bosch at gnat dot com, jh at suse dot cz
- Cc: aj at suse dot de, davem at redhat dot com, dberlin at dberlin dot org,dewar at gnat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, mark at codesourcery dot com,roger at eyesopen dot com, rth at redhat dot com
- Date: Thu, 16 May 2002 10:59:25 -0400 (EDT)
- Subject: Re: -O2 versus -O1 (Was: Re: GCSE store motion)
> A second important goal for -O1 is to keep code as debuggable as
> possible. This rules out at least the sibling calls optimization, but
> probably others as well.
Is this really a goal? Because if it is, we fall far short, -O1 code is
nowhere near "as debuggable as possible".