This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Should optimization/6627 be considered a regression for 3.1?


On Fri, 10 May 2002, David O'Brien wrote:
> -fno-align-functions is not obeyed in 3.1 as it was in 2.95.3.
> (bug report also posted to gcc-bugs)

Certainly, as far as I can see and reproduce, so I updated this PR to
high priority (though gnatsweb somehow "swallowed" the Audit-Trail and
probably the email notification as well).

It's too late for GCC 3.1, but should be on the list for 3.1.1, as it
reduces GCC's utility for some embedded (and bootloader) scenarios.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]