This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

64-bit integers - long long (only on x86?)


In my own experience, gcc does poorer than other good compilers when 
dealing with long long 64-bit integers on x86. I have also talked to 
others experiencing the same, and just the other day, Jack Lloyd posted 
a link to some results which indicated the same. Is there a wellknown 
reason for this, and what is it? If it's not wellknown, I will produce 
some examples, for comparison. Code that is heavily based on long long 
calculations on x86, usually is about 30% faster on Intel's and 
Microsofts compilers, compared to gcc, which is considerable. That 
number is consistent with the numbers from Jack Lloyd's link.

/David


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]