This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example

From: Jason Merrill <jason at redhat dot com>
To: "David Abrahams" <david dot abrahams at rcn dot com>
Cc: <python-dev at python dot org>,"Ralf W. Grosse-Kunstleve" <rwgk at cci dot lbl dot gov>, <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>,"Martin v. Loewis" <martin at v dot loewis dot de>,<c++std-ext at research dot att dot com>
Date: Sun, 12 May 2002 15:30:48 +0100
Subject: Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
References: <09b501c1f634$04747d80$6501a8c0@boostconsulting.com><wvl4rhdn0d9.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><0c2501c1f9ab$32ea8a40$8f01a8c0@boostconsulting.com><wvly9eplbyp.fsf@prospero.cambridge.redhat.com><0c4501c1f9bf$583bd330$8f01a8c0@boostconsulting.com>

>>>>> "David" == David Abrahams <david.abrahams@rcn.com> writes:

>> I noticed that the readme says that the test passes on Solaris.  Does it
>> provide these semantics?  How about SCO?  Anyone?

> The test as written doesn't really tell us the answer since it uses EH and
> any implementation can make it a non-issue by comparing type_info::name()
> strings instead of addresses.

I meant using gcc 3.0.4 on Solaris.

Jason

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
  - From: David Abrahams

References:
- Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
  - From: David Abrahams
- Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
  - From: Jason Merrill
- Re: Minimal GCC/Linux shared lib + EH bug example
  - From: David Abrahams

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]