This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Anyone got irix5? I have questions about your ctype implementation
> From: Rainer Orth <ro@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
>
> Kaveh R. Ghazi writes:
>
> > Testresults (with f77!) from irix6.2:
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-05/msg00322.html
>
> Mine look considerably worse at the moment:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2002-05/msg00358.html
>
> This is due to two main problems: I bootstrapped without your
> irix5.2/bits/os_defines.h patch, which accounts for the g++ and
> libstdc++-v3 testsuite failures.
Yes, bit to clean up the libstdc++-v3 resuls as much as mine you also
need a few more patches. I've already installed these on the trunk
and I hope to get these into 3.1.1. If you want to try them out, here
they are:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00085.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00088.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00236.html
I use this one too. Though its not tied to any testsuite failure I'm
aware of, it's still good preventative medicine:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2002-05/msg00347.html
> I'll probably submit a equivalent patch
> defining CPP_PREDEFINES to fix this for 3.1.1.
Ok, I was going to do this, but if you want to take over that's fine.
The holdup on my end was that I was trying to figure out a way to enable
it for only pre-6.5 irix6. No need to apply the hack on irix6.5 since
that appears to work fine.
> The libjava failures are spurious: most failures seem to be due to
I haven't gotten to java on irix6.2, and I'm not sure I plan to... :-)
--Kaveh
--
Kaveh R. Ghazi Director of Systems Architecture
ghazi@caip.rutgers.edu Qwest Global Services