This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
>>>>> "Toon" == Toon Moene <email@example.com> writes:
> Jason Merrill wrote:
>> >>>>> "Toon" == Toon Moene <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> > I cannot for the love of it understand how so many last-minute changes
>> > need to be applied to the 3.1 branch. It's not that it isn't already in
>> > existence for half a year.
>> Because a lot of regressions were only noticed at the last minute.
> Well, this is exactly what I think is wrong with our "regression
> We shouldn't act on every regression that surfaces in the last minute
> like it should uphold the release.
> My take on it is that we should establish a no-later-than date for
> release-inhibiting "regressions".
Makes sense to me. The last stages of the 3.1 release have been
unreasonably attenuated by everyone waiting for the last fix, and then the
next last fix...