This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
[OT]Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0
On Thursday 09 May 2002 14:02, Tim Prince wrote:
> On Thursday 09 May 2002 09:01, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Erik Schnetter wrote:
> > > Tim Prince <tprince at computer dot org> wrote:
> > > > icc's equivalent to -fstrict-aliasing is -ansi. It's not a default.
> > >
> > > I couldn't find anything about aliasing in the description of "-ansi".
> > It does what he says, however, i can prove it through option dumps (it
> > turns on P2OPT_disam_assume_ansi_c)
> > > -erik
> description of -ansi is certainly oblique. It assumes [the program is in]
> conformance with ISO C89 [the main consequence being that typed aliasing
> analysis can be employed, as with gcc -fstrict-aliasing].
My remarks here, while on medical leave from my employer, for whom I don't
speak, have been taken as out of bounds, so I apologize.