This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

[OT]Re: Benchmarks gcc 3.0.4 (soon 3.1) vs. Intel C++ 6.0


On Thursday 09 May 2002 14:02, Tim Prince wrote:
> On Thursday 09 May 2002 09:01, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 May 2002, Erik Schnetter wrote:
> > > Tim Prince <tprince at computer dot org> wrote:
> > > > icc's equivalent to -fstrict-aliasing is -ansi.  It's not a default.
> > >
> > > I couldn't find anything about aliasing in the description of "-ansi".
> >
> > It does what he says, however, i can prove it through option dumps (it
> > turns on P2OPT_disam_assume_ansi_c)
> >
snipped
> > > -erik
>
snipped
>The
> description of -ansi is certainly oblique.  It assumes [the program is in]
> conformance with ISO C89 [the main consequence being that typed aliasing
> analysis can be employed, as with gcc -fstrict-aliasing].

My remarks here, while on medical leave from my employer, for whom I don't 
speak, have been taken as out of bounds, so I apologize.

-- 
Tim Prince


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]