This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: G95 Floating point arithmetics without GMP?
- From: law at redhat dot com
- To: "Joseph S. Myers" <jsm28 at cam dot ac dot uk>
- Cc: Steven Bosscher <s dot bosscher at student dot tudelft dot nl>, Zack Weinberg <zack at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 17:28:10 -0600
- Subject: Re: G95 Floating point arithmetics without GMP?
- Reply-to: law at redhat dot com
In message <Pine.LNX.email@example.com
.uk>, "Joseph S. Myers" writes:
> On Wed, 8 May 2002 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> > > > In general, do not hesitate to add tree codes to tree.def when they
> > > > can reasonably express a language-independent concept. POWER_EXPR is
> > > > one such.
> > >
> > > I defined it in f95-tree.def because I thought it shouldn't be in
> > > tree.def.
> > It's a generic enough concept that it probably should migrate into
> > the toplevel tree.def.
> There used to be something called EXPON_EXPR as a placeholder in tree.def.
And your point is?
If this is something the g95 folks will need/use, then it really
belongs in tree.def. It was probably removed because nobody actually