This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: SH5 compact register numbering in gcc -> gdb interface
Joern Rennecke writes:
> email@example.com wrote:
> > Humor me here.
> > How do you use dwarf2 cfi to unwind a compact register (saved on the
> > stack) back to a media register? In addition to the address of the
> > saved register you'll need to know that only part of the register was
> > saved. Does CFI describe this?
> With the proposed numbering change (2nd revision), we get different
> numbers to describe compact an media registers. So when only the lower
> 32 bits are saved, gcc can use the SHcompact register number to describe
> N.B., the upper 32 bits of the register are actually overwritten in the
> process. The restore from the stack sign-extends from bit 31. The caller
> is responsible to make sure that no 64 bit value is live in the register.
Yes. We seem to agree on the register numbering scheme.
> 2430 Aztec West / Almondsbury / BRISTOL / BS32 4AQ
> T:+44 1454 462330